目的:研究调节抑制对不同单色光中豚鼠眼屈光发育的作用。方法:根据光照不同将豚鼠分成蓝光组(430 nm)、绿光组(530 nm)和白光组(色温5 000 K),每组各8只。各组豚鼠右眼均点1%阿托品滴眼液,每天1次,持续6周。实验前后各测一次屈光度、角膜曲率半径以及眼轴各参数。结果:实验前各组豚鼠双侧眼间及组间同侧眼屈光度差异无统计学意义(约4.25 D,P >0.05)。但实验结束时蓝光组和绿光组双侧眼间屈光度差异显著(P=0.0003和P=0.028),而白光组双侧眼间无显著差异(P=0.7486)。实验结束时各组左眼(P<0.05)、绿光组和白光组右眼(P=0.001)以及蓝光组和绿光组右眼(P <0.001)屈光差异有统计学意义。蓝光组和白光组右眼屈光差异无统计学意义( P =0.072)。实验开始时各组双侧眼间及各组间同侧眼玻璃体腔长度差异无统计学意义(约3.2 mm,P>0.05)。实验结束时,蓝光组和绿光组双侧眼间玻璃体腔长度差异有统计学意义(P=0.0017和P=0.0113),但白光组双侧眼间差异无统计学意义(P=0.9371)。同时,各组间同侧眼玻璃体腔长度差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。此外,实验前后各组双侧眼间及组间同侧眼角膜曲率半径、前节长度、晶状体厚度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:1%阿托品加强530 nm单色光促进豚鼠眼玻璃体腔延长和近视形成的作用,但减弱430 nm单色光抑制豚鼠眼玻璃体腔延长和远视形成的作用。眼调节反应可能参与了单色光中豚鼠眼的屈光发育机制。阿托品影响单色光中豚鼠眼屈光发育的作用可能是通过抑制眼调节反应实现的。
Objective: To investigate the effect of inhibiting accommodation on ocular refractive development of guinea pigs in different monochromatic lights. Methods: Twenty-four pigmented guinea pigs were randomly divided into three groups with 8 animals per group: short-wavelength light (SL, 430 nm) group, middle-wavelength light (ML,530 nm) group and broad-band light (BL, 5 000 K color temperature) group. The right eyes of all animals were treated by 1% Atropine solution once a day for 6 weeks. Measurements of ocular refraction, corneal curvature, and axial length were performed at the start and the end of the study. Results: There was no significant difference in bilateral ocular refraction for all groups at the beginning of the experiment (about 4.25 D, P>0.05) and in ipsilateral ocular refraction among groups at the start of the experiment (P>0.05). But at the end of the experiment,significant differences were detected between binocular refraction of the ML group (P=0.028) and the SL group (P=0.0003), however, there was no significant difference between bilateral refraction in the BL group (P=0.7486).There were significant differences in refraction between the left eyes of any two groups (P<0.05), between the right eyes of the ML and BL group (P=0.001), and between the right eyes of the ML and SL (P<0.001) at 6 weeks.No significant refractive difference was detected between the right eyes of the SL and BL groups (P=0.072). The vitreous length was about 3.2 mm in bilateral eyes of all groups at the onset of the experiment (all inner- or inter-group P>0.05). After the experiment, the bilateral difference in vitreous length was significant in the ML group(P=0.0113) and the SL group (P=0.0017), but not significant in the BL group (P=0.9371). There were significant vitreous differences in right or left eyes among the groups at the end of the experiment (P<0.01). There were no significant inter-group (ipsilateral) or inner-group (bilateral) differences at any time in any of corneal radius of curvature, anterior segment length and lens thickness (P>0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusion: 1% atropine can strengthen the effect of vitreous elongation and myopic formation on guinea pig eyes in 530 nm monochromatic light. Moreover, atropine can weaken the effect of vitreous shortening and hyperopic formation on guinea pig eyes in 430 nm monochromatic light. Ocular accommodation response should involve in the mechanism of refractive development of guinea pig in monochromatic light. Atropine can influence the refractive development of guinea pig in monochromatic light possibly by inhibiting accommodation response.
本文报告1例2 8岁男性青年患者,行飞秒制瓣准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(laser-assisted situ keratomileusis,LASIK)术 后1个月视力进行性下降,小瞳下行电脑验光矫正视力,右眼为0.3(-0.25×86°),左眼为0.2(-0.50×91°)。眼前节及眼底检查未见器质性病变,视觉电生理检查未见异常。视光专科检查示负相对调节/正相对调节(negative correlatione regulation/positive ccorrelation regulation,NRA/PRA):+2.00 D/?10.00 D(行PRA时稍作停顿后又可看清),Flipper拍检查:右眼(oculus dexter,OD) 10 cpm(+),左眼(oculus sinister,OS) 22 cpm(+),双眼(binocular,OU)12 cpm(+),正镜片逐渐通过困难。隐斜检查:2△BO@D,13△BI@N。调节性集合与调节的比值(accommodation convergence/accommodation,AC/A)=1。患者PRA显著增高,Flipper检查正片通过困难,看近时外隐斜大于看远,提示可能存在“集合不足,调节超前”。给予托比卡胺滴眼液滴眼3次后验光:OD +1.00/-0.50×80°=1.0,OS +0.75/-0.25×65°=1.0,进一步证实了“调节痉挛”的诊断。给予托比卡胺滴眼液滴双眼,睡前1次,结合调节放松训练。4周后,裸眼视力及屈光度稳定在正常范围。临床上对于视力下降原因不明、排除眼部器质性疾病的患者,经过仔细询问病史、睫状肌麻痹检影和视功能检查“调节痉挛”不难诊断。除传统的睫状肌麻痹剂和近附加镜外,治疗方案建议加用视功能训练可使视力恢复并稳定。
A 28-year-old man was referred to our hospital because of blurred vision in both eyes after LASIK flap made by femtosecond laser surgery for 1 month. The best corrected visual acuity based on computerized optometry was 0.3 (-0.25×86°) in the right eye and 0.2 (-0.50×91°) in the left eye. Routine examinations were conducted to exclude eye diseases. Visual electrophysiological examination showed no abnormalities. Optometry specialty examination: negative relative accommodation (NRA) and positive relative accommodation (PRA) were +2.00 D/?10.00 D (when doing PRA, the patient could see clear slowly after a pause). Flipper examination showed: OD 10 cpm(+), OS 22 cpm(+), OU 12 cpm(+). Phoria-measurement showed 2 prism degree BO@D and 13 prism degree BI@N. AC/A=1. The patient’s high PRA, flipper examination results and convergence insufficiency at near distance indicated the possibility of “convergence insufficiency and accommodative spasm”. Cycloplegic refraction was planned to assess the real diopter. After instillation of cycloplegic drops, the UCVA improved to 1.0 and the refractive error to -0.25×93 in the right eye, in the left eye to 1.0 and the refractive error to -0.25×75. the BCVA was 1.0 (+1.00/-0.50×80°) in the right eye and 1.0 (+0.75/-0.25×65°) in the left eye. A diagnosis of accommodative spasm was made. The patient was counseled and continued cycloplegic drops one time daily before bedtime, participated in vision training for 4 weeks. This patient was a rare occurrence of accommodative spasm after FSLASIK surgery. Young patients with poor gain in UCVA can be subjected to a corrective procedure accidentally. Relaxation exercises and cycloplegic drops may cure accommodative spasm. For patients with unexplained causes of vision loss and excluded organic diseases of the eye, it is not difficult to diagnose “accommodative spasm” by careful medical history inquiry, ciliary muscle paralysis optometry and visual function examination. In addition to traditional ciliary palsy agent and reading glasses, it is suggested that visual function training can restore and stabilize the treatment effect.