目的: 探讨 ETDRS 对数视力表对儿童视力检查的可重复性及其影响的相关因素。

方法: 在流行病学调查的过程中, 随机使用 ETDRS 对数视力表, 为 250 位裸眼视力低于 0.5 和 98 位视力正常儿童进行裸眼视力重复检查。
结果: 两次视力测量之间差异的均数为0.004log^±0.07; Kappa 分析结果具有很好的一致性(k = 0.71) ; 性别与视力检查一致性无明显相关(P = 0.845) ; 年龄与视力检查一致性有显著相关性(P = 0.019) , 年龄越小视力检查一致性越差; 屈光不正与视力检查一致性也有显著相关性(P = 0.000) , 近视度数在- 1.00D～- 5.00D 之间的儿童视力检查一致性相对差, 而正视眼的视力检查一致性较好。

结论: 结果提示 ETDRS 对数视力表适合儿童视力检查, 建议推广使用。

Purpose: To evaluate repeatability of the ETDRS log MAR visual acuity measurementin children and the relative influence factors.

Methods: The children (n = 348) with visual acuity less than 0.5 ( equal to 0.3 logunit) in either eye,or one tenth in children with normal visual acuity were chosen todo repeatable uncorrected VA measurement with Bland-Altman analysis and Kappa analysis using ETDRS acuity chart.

Results: The mean difference of visual acuity was 0.004log^±0.07. There was a significant repeatability (k = 0.71) between two visual acuity examination. There were significant consistent results both on male and female patients (P = 0.845) . A significant relationship was found between age and VA repeatability(P = 0.019) . The VA repeatability could also be influenced by refractive error (P = 0.000) . The acuity measurement in children with emmetropia (k = 0.82) had a higher repeatability than in the children with myopia (k = 0.66) .

Conclusions: The ETDRS visual acuity chart can provide a repeatable measure of visual acuity in children. It is recommended for clinic examination of children. 

目的：应用Cirrus HD-OCT 5000对正常眼黄斑及视盘血流参数进行血管成像测量，评估其可重复性及再现性。方法：纳入40只正常眼进行前瞻性研究。操作者A于一周内3天的同一时段(T1，T2，T3)对正常受试者的同一眼黄斑及视盘进行3次血管成像扫描，扫描过程中均开启FastTrac^TM图像跟踪功能，操作者B在T 2时间点再次对受试者同一眼进行相同程序扫描，使用Angio PlexMetrix^TM量化软件(版本10.0)自动测量黄斑和视盘的血管长度密度(vessel length density，VD)和血管灌注密度(vascular perfusion density，PD)。应用单因素方差分析或非参数检验比较3次扫描的VD、PD是否有差异。采用组内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficient，ICC)、变异系数(coefficient of variation，CV)评价操作者A的可重复性，采用一致性相关系数(consistent correlation coefficient，CCC)、重复性系数(repeatability coefficient，CR)、C V评价操作者间的再现性。结果：操作者A对黄斑及视盘各区域3次扫描的V D、P D之间差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。操作者A对黄斑和视盘V D、PD 3次扫描的ICC值分别为0.260~0.517、0.362~0.898，黄斑及视盘各区域V D、P D的C V值均<8.1%。黄斑和视盘V D、P D的操作者间CCC值分别为0.3130~0.5665、0.5149~0.7801；黄斑VD和PD的CR值分别为3.2212~4.6399、0.0574~0.0832；视盘VD和PD的CR值分别为2.0675~4.0630、0.0447~0.0730。黄斑CV值均<9.0%，视盘CV值均<6.9%。结论：非同日的同一时段视盘浅层血流参数具有较好的重复性及再现性，黄斑浅层血流参数的重复性及再现性相对较差。

Objective: To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of quantification of macular and peri-papillary superficial capillaries in normal eyes using Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 angiography. Methods: Forty normal eyes were included in this prospective study. Angiography 3 mm × 3 mm scan protocol centered on the disc or macula of the same eye was repeated 3 times by operator A in the same period on 3 days (T1, T2, T3) within 1 week,and the FastTrac^TM image tracking function was turned on during the scan. Operator B repeated the same scan independently at T2 after operator A. Angio Plex Metrix^TM quantification software (version 10.0) was used to automatically measure the vessel length density (VD) and vascular perfusion density (PD) of macular and peri-papillary superficial capillaries. One-way analysis of variance or nonparametric test was used to compare the VD and PD measurements of the 3 scans. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV)were calculated to evaluate the intra-operator repeatability. Consistent correlation coefficient (CCC), repeatability coefficient (CR), and CV were calculated to evaluate the inter-operator reproducibility. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the measurements of VD and PD between the 3 scans of the macular and peri-papillary superficial capillaries by operator A (P>0.05). The ICC values for the 3 scans of VD and PD of the macular and peri-papillary superficial capillaries by operator A were 0.260–0.517 and 0.362~0.898, respectively.The CV values of the VD and PD of the macular and peri-papillary superficial capillaries were all <8.1%. The inter-operator CCC values of the macular and peri-papillary superficial capillaries were 0.3130–0.5665 and 0.5149~0.7801,respectively; the CR values of the VD and PD of macula were 3.2212–4.6399 and 0.0574–0.0832, respectively; the CR values of the VD and PD of optic disc were 2.0675–4.0630 and 0.0447–0.0730, respectively. The CV values of macular were all <9.0%, and the CV values of optic disc were all <6.9%. Conclusion:The macular and peri-papillary superficial capillaries parameters in the same period on different days have a good repeatability and reproducibility,while the superficial macular blood flow parameters have relatively poor repeatability and reproducibility.

目的：评价不同操作者使用视网膜自动图像分析(automated retinal image analyzer，ARIA)软件测量糖尿病患者视网膜血管管径和迂曲度的重复性和再现性。方法：采用前瞻性诊断性试验研究设计，由2名熟练操作者应用ARIA软件对49名糖尿病患者以视盘为中心的45°数码眼底彩照进行视网膜血管半自动分析。通过测量距离视盘0.5~1.0个视盘直径内的视网膜动静脉血管参数，各选取6条最粗的动静脉综合计算得到中央动脉管径当量(central retinal artery equivalent，CRAE)、视网膜中央静脉管径当量(central retinal vein equivalent，CRVE)、视网膜动静脉比值(arteriole-to-venule ratio，AVR)、平均视网膜动脉迂曲度(mean retinal arteriolar tortuosity，MRAT)、平均视网膜静脉迂曲度(mean retinal venular tortuosity，MRVT)。在此基础上，评价同一操作者与不同操作者间测量结果的重复性和再现性，并绘制Bland-Altman图进行一致性分析。结果：操作者A两次测量的CRAE、CRVE、AVR差异无统计学意义(t= -0.089、-1.425、1.214，均P>0.05)，重复性良好(ICC≥0.725)且高度正相关(r≥0.721)。操作者A与操作者B对同一受试者2次测量的CRAE、CRVE、AVR差异无统计学意义(t= -1.169、-0.050、0.941，均P>0.05)，再现性良好(ICC≥0.750)且高度正相关( r≥0.697)。同一操作者和不同操作者间的MR AT、MRVT差异无统计学意义

(P≥0.05)，Spearman非参数相关性分析重复性和再现性较好(r≥0.571，r≥0.588，均P<0.01)。结论：利用ARIA软件测量糖尿病患者视网膜血管管径及迂曲度具有良好的重复性和再现性。

Objective: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility in measurements of retinal vessel diameter and tortuosity in diabetic patients using the Automated Retinal Image Analyzer (ARIA). Methods: A prospective diagnostic trial was performed; 2 skilled researchers performed a semi-automatic analysis of retinal vessels in digital color fundus photography (45° field of view centered on the optic disc) from 49 diabetic patients using ARIA software. Six largest arterioles and venules coursing through an area of 0.5–1.0 disc diameter surrounding the optic disc were selected. Then the retinal vessel parameters were calculated into the central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE), central retinal vein equivalent (CRVE), arteriole-to-venule ratio (AVR), mean retinal arteriolar tortuosity (MRAT) and mean retinal venular tortuosity (MRVT). To evaluate the repeatability of those values in 2 measurements by the same researcher and the reproducibility between different researchers. Bland-Altman analysis was employed to assess the agreement of the outcomes. Results: There was no significant difference in the CRAE, CRVE, and AVR values in the two-time measurements of researcher A (t= -0.089, -1.425 and 1.214, all P>0.05). It also showed a good repeatability and a highly positive correlation (ICC≥0.725, r≥0.721). There was no significant difference in those measurements between researcher A and B (t= -1.169, -0.050, 0.941, all P>0.05). It also showed a good reproducibility and a highly positive correlation (ICC≥0.750, r≥0.697). Results showed that there was no significant difference in the MRAT and MRVT values both in intraobserver and interobserver measurements (P≥0.05). Besides, Spearman’s nonparametric correlation analysis showed good repeatability and reproducibility (r≥0.571, r≥0.588, all P<0.01). Conclusion: ARIA software yields good repeatability and reproducibility in the measurements of retinal vessel diameter and tortuosity in diabetic patients.