目的：探讨眼外伤门诊急诊与住院病房一体化管理模式。方法：中山大学中山眼科中心于2015年4月成立眼外伤急诊部，组建眼外伤急诊队伍，实现眼外伤门诊急诊与住院病房一体化管理，即眼外伤患者从门诊到病房的接诊、治疗、随访进行一体化管理，简化急诊诊疗流程，最大限度保证医疗护理质量。结果：眼外伤门诊急诊与住院病房一体化管理模式是一种以患者为中心的新型管理模式。该模式能保障急诊患者诊治的及时性、连贯性；缩短急诊患者就诊到等候手术的时间，提高患者就诊满意度；在保证医疗质量的同时，医护人力资源得到合理高效使用；并取得较好的社会效益与经济效益。结论：眼外伤门诊急诊与住院病房一体化管理模式具备长远发展及推广的价值。
Objective: To discuss the integrated management in emergency department and wards for patients of ocular trauma. Methods: The emergency department and the team were organized in April 2015 to simplify the process of treatment for patients of ocular trauma, and to improve the benefit and outcome for those patients. Results: The integrated management of emergency department and wards for patients of ocular trauma was a new management model focusing upon the benefit of patients. This model could guarantee the timeliness and continuity by reducing waiting time for diagnosis or operations. The integrated model had obvious economic and social benefits by improving quality of care and reasonably using human resource. Conclusion: TTe integrated management model in emergency department and wards for patients of ocular trauma is worthy of further application.
目的：探讨眼底外科医护一体组团合作模式在管理眼底病日间手术患者实践效果。方法：选取2022年1—6月进行日间手术的582例眼底病患者为对照组，2023年1—6月进行日间手术的633例眼底病患者为研究组，对照组实施责任制整体护理，研究组采取实施医护一体组团合作管理模式进行全流程患者管理。使用χ2检验和t检验比较两组患者围术期护理知识健康教育知晓度、满意度、出院24 h内眼科急症就诊率、出院24 h内随访率、护士职业获益感的差异。结果：研究组患者健康教育知晓度高于对照组，组间比较差异具有统计学意义(t=–18.47，P＜0.05)；研究组患者满意度高于对照组，组间比较差异具有统计学意义(t=–4.005，P＜0.05)；研究组患者出院24 h内随访率为100%，对照组为98.1%，两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=12.073，P＜0.05)；研究组患者出院24 h内眼科急症就诊率0.94%，对照组为1.89%，组间比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.951，P=0.222)；实施后护士职业获益感分值高于实施前，组间比较差异具有统计学意义(t=–6.637，P＜0.001)。结论：医护一体组团合作管理模式进行眼底外科日间手术患者围术期的全流程管理，改善患者就医感受，提升患者就医体验，提高眼底外专科日间手术患者的依从性，保障患者的安全，提高护士职业获益感。
Objective: To investigate the practical effect of the integrated group cooperation model in managing patients with fundus diseases in day surgery. Methods: 582 patients with fundus disease who underwent day surgery from January to June in 2022 were included as the control group, and 633 patients with fundus disease who underwent day surgery from January to June in 2023 were selected as the study group. The control group implemented the overall responsibility nursing system, while the study group carried out the collaborative management model, integrating medical and nursing for the entire process of patient management. Chi-square test and T-test were used to compare the differences of perioperative nursing knowledge, health education awareness, satisfaction, emergency ophthalmological consultation rate within 24 hours of discharge, follow-up rate within 24 hours of discharge, and nurses' sense of professional benefit between the two groups. Results: The awareness of health education in the study group was higher than that in the control group, and there was significant statistically difference between two groups (t=–18.47, P<0.05). The satisfaction of patients in the study group was higher than that in the control group, and there was significant statistically difference between two groups (t=–4.005, P ＜ 0.05). The follow-up rate within 24 hours after discharge was 100% in the study group and 98.1% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=12.073, P<0.05). The incidence of ophthalmic emergencies within 24 hours of discharge in the study group was 0.94%, while in the control group it was 1.89%. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2= 1.951, P=0.222). The perceived benefit score of nurses after implementation was higher than that before implementation, and there was statistically significant between two groups (t=–6.637, P<0.05). Conclusions: The medical and nursing integrated group cooperation management model is used to manage the entire perioperative process of patients undergoing day surgery in fundus surgery. This model can improve patients' medical experience, enhance their compliance with ophthalmic surgery, ensure their safety. At the same time, it can enhance the senses of professional benefits for nurses.
目的：了解思政元素融入临床医学八年制眼科学整合课程的学生满意度与教学效果。方法：对中山大学临床医学八年制的五年级医学生进行匿名纸质版问卷调查，评估学生对思政教育的满意度与教育效果。对问卷结果进行描述性统计分析，计数资料以频率与百分比的形式表示。结果：共回收有效问卷90份，91%的学生认同在课程中融入思政元素，93%的学生认为思政与课程的融合度为好或者非常好，82%的学生认为思政课程对激发眼科学兴趣有帮助。思政题目的总体正确率高达92.9%，正确率从高到低依次为：医患沟通(100%)、眼科历史(98.9%)、政策要点(83.3%)、研究前沿(82.2%)。结论：临床医学八年制学生对眼科学整合课程的思政元素融合的满意度高。思政教育获得良好效果，学生对思政知识的掌握度高。后续课程在保持学生对医患沟通以及学科历史兴趣的同时，还应加强对于研究前沿和政策要点的教育。
Objective: To investigate the student satisfaction and educational effect of integrating ideological and political elements into the eight-year clinical medicine ophthalmology integrated curriculum. Methods: An anonymous paper questionnaire survey was administered to fifth-grade clinical medicine students ofthe eight-year clinical medicine program of Sun Yat-sen University to assess students’ satisfaction with ideological and political education as well as the educational effectiveness. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed on thequestionnaire results, and the qualitative data were represented by frequency and percentage. Results: Ninety valid surveys were collected. 91% of the students agreed with the incorporation of ideological and political elements into the curriculum, 93% of the students thought the incorporation of ideological and political elements into the curriculum was good or very good, and 82% of the students believed that the ideological and political curricula helped arouse their interest in ophthalmology. The overall correct rate for ideological and political questions reached 92.9%, with the following correct rates from most accurate to least accurate: doctor-patient communication (100%), history of ophthalmology (98.9%), policy (83.3%), and research frontier (82.2%). Conclusion: Eight-year clinical medicine students are highly satisfied with the integration of intellectual and political components into the ophthalmology integration curriculum. Ideological and political education has yielded favorable results, with students demonstrating a thorough grasp of ideological and political facts. Future curricula should expand students’ awareness of research frontiers and policy issues while maintaining their interest in doctor-patient communication and the history of ophthalmology.
