目的：探讨青光眼日间手术患者的自我管理行为现状及影响因素分析。方法：采用便利抽样法选取2021年9月—2022年5月于广州市某三级甲等眼科专科医院就诊的223例青光眼日间手术患者。采用一般资料调查表、青光眼自我管理行为量表、慢性疾病自我效能量表和青光眼知识学习问卷进行问卷调查。结果：青光眼日间手术患者的自我管理行为得分为(54.03±6.95)分，其中生活调整维度得分最低。慢性病自我效能与自我管理行为呈正相关(r=0.368, P<0.001)。疾病知识与自我管理行为无显著相关性(r=0.077, P=0.252)。多因素线性回归分析结果显示，患者的文化程度(P<0.001)和自我效能(P=0.028)是自我管理行为的影响因素，可解释自我管理行为总变异的12.4%。结论：青光眼日间手术患者具有良好的自我管理行为，较低的自我效能和文化程度是自我管理行为的危险因素，因此应优先提高患者的自我效能，并提供个性化教育。
Objective: To determine self-management and its association with self-efficacy and knowledge among glaucoma patients undergoing day surgery. Methods: A total of 223 glaucoma patients were recruited from September 2021 to May 2022and they were investigated with the Glaucoma Self Management Questionnaire (GSMQ), The Self- Efficacy in Chronic Disease Scale (SECD-6), and the glaucoma knowledge questionnaire. Results: Of the 223 study participants, the study population had a total GSMQ score of 54.03±6.95 with the lowest score found in the life adjustment dimension. The total SECD-6 score was showing a significantly positive correlation with the total GSMQ score(r =0.368, P <0.001). The total score of disease knowledge was without significant correlation with the total GSMQ score (r =0.077, P =0.252). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that self-efficacy (P <0.001) and education level was independently associated with self-management(P =0.028). Conclusions: Glaucoma patients undergoing daytime surgery demonstrated good overall self-management, yet further improvement was required in terms of life adjustment. Low self-efficacy and educational level were identified as risk factors for self-management. Therefore, self-management programs should prioritize enhancing patients' self-efficacy and delivering individualized education.
目的：了解湿性老年性黄斑变性(age-related macular degeneration,AMD)患者自我感受负担(self-perceived burden,SPB)现状及其影响因素。方法：采用方便抽样法选取2021年1月至11月在中山大学中山眼科中心就诊的204例湿性AMD患者为研究对象，采用一般资料调查表、SPB量表、家庭支持自评量表、医学应对问卷对其进行测评。结果：患者SPB得分是(21.98±6.68)分，总体属于轻度SPB。湿性AMD患者的SPB水平与家庭支出(r=?0.326, P<0.001)和面对应对(r=?0.365, P<0.001)呈负相关，与回避(r=0.456, P<0.001)及屈服(r=0.310, P<0.001)应对方式呈正相关性。多重线性回归显示，独居、高龄、自费、双眼患病及采用回避应对的患者的SPB更高，而高文化水平、高家庭支持的患者SPB较轻。结论：湿性AMD患者有轻度SPB，但仍存在改善空间，医护工作者在工作中应重点关注高龄、文化程度低、家庭收入低、自费、独居、双眼患病及低视力的患者，及时进行心理疏导，减轻患者的SPB水平。
Objective: To understand the current status and influencing factors of self-preceived burden (SPB) in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: 204 patiens with wet AMD who were treated in Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University from January to November 2021 were enrolled as the study subjects with convenience sampling method. A general information questionnaire, SPB scale, family support self-assessment scale, and medical coping questionnaire were collected from the subjects for assessment. Results: The patient’s SPB score was 21.98±6.68, which is generally mild SPB. The SPB level of patients with wet AMD was negatively correlated with family support (r=-0.326, P<0.001) and coping (r=?0.365, P<0.001), and were positively correlated with avoidance (r= 0.456,P<0.001), and surrender (r=0.310, P<0.001) coping style. Multiple linear regression showed that the patients who lived alone, were elder and self-funded, had binoclur diseases and used avoidance coping, had higher SPB. While the patients with high education and family support had lower SPB. Conclusions: It is still needed to pay attention to the patients with AMD having mild SPB. Medical workers should focus on patients with elder age, low education level, low family income, self-funded, living alone, binocular disease and low vision in their work, and provide timely psychological counseling to reduce the SPB level of patients.
目的：检索并总结开角型青光眼患者眼部用药规范化护理管理的最佳证据，为临床实践提供参考。方法：通过护理循证方法提出实践问题，按照循证证据检索数据库的“6S”分类模型，检索有关开角型青光眼患者眼部用药管理的所有证据资源类型，包括临床指南、最佳实践信息册、证据总结、系统评价和专家共识等。由2名循证护理研究员对纳入文献的质量进行独立评价并进行证据的归纳总结。结果：最终纳入12篇文献，包括4篇指南、3篇证据总结和5篇系统评价；汇总了19条有关开角型青光眼眼部用药管理的最佳证据，包括滴眼技术指导、依从性管理和信息提供3个方面。结论：总结开角型青光眼眼部用药管理的最佳证据，可为临床医务人员管理患者提供参考和借鉴，以达到患者规范用药、控制眼压和延缓疾病进展的目的。
Objective: To retrieve and summarize the best evidence on standardized ocular medication management among open-angle glaucoma patients. Methods: With evidence-based nursing method, practical problemswere identified. According to the “6S” pyramid model of evidence resource, studies on standardized ocular medication management among open-angle glaucoma patients were retrieved, including clinical guidelines, best practice information booklet, systematic reviews, and expert consensus. Two evidence-based nursing researchers independently evaluated the quality of the included literature and summarized the evidence. Results: A total of 12 articles were ultimately enrolled, including 4 clinical guidelines, 3 evidence summaries and 5 systematic reviews. Finally, 3 aspects including 19 pieces of best evidence were summarized, which were Eye drop technical instruction, medication adherence management and related information provision. Conclusion: The best evidence for the medication management of open-angle glaucoma patients were summarized, which provide reference for clinical medical staffs to manage patients, so as to achieve the purpose of standardizing medication,controlling intraocular pressure and preventing disease progression.
Purpose: The day surgery mode has significantly reduced preoperative waiting time for patients. However, this mode also led to brief and sometimes abrupt interactions between patients with vision loss and nursing staff during the preoperative visits. Additionally, patients may experience negative emotions. The aim of this study was to describe the preoperative experiences and identify related stressful factors among patients waiting vitreo-retinal day surgery. Methods: This study was guided by an interpretive approach. Semi-structured, face-to-face, in-depth interviews were conducted with patients from August 2021 to October 2024. Inductive content analysis and research software were used to analyze the data. Results: Twenty-seven patients agreed to participate the interviews. Their ages ranged from 19 to 70 years old. The waiting time before hospitalization varied from 7 to 90 days. Three main categories emerged from patients’ complaints: day surgery procedures, concerns about eye conditions and supports. Conclusions: The findings underscore the importance of preoperative care services. It is suggested that providing accurate preoperative information and effective support can significantly enhance the quality of preoperative care service.
Purpose: The day surgery mode has significantly reduced preoperative waiting time for patients. However, this mode also led to brief and sometimes abrupt interactions between patients with vision loss and nursing staff during the preoperative visits. Additionally, patients may experience negative emotions. The aim of this study was to describe the preoperative experiences and identify related stressful factors among patients waiting vitreo-retinal day surgery. Methods: This study was guided by an interpretive approach. Semi-structured, face-to-face, in-depth interviews were conducted with patients from August 2021 to October 2024. Inductive content analysis and research software were used to analyze the data. Results: Twenty-seven patients agreed to participate the interviews. Their ages ranged from 19 to 70 years old. The waiting time before hospitalization varied from 7 to 90 days. Three main categories emerged from patients’ complaints: day surgery procedures, concerns about eye conditions and supports. Conclusions: The findings underscore the importance of preoperative care services. It is suggested that providing accurate preoperative information and effective support can significantly enhance the quality of preoperative care service.
目的：探讨眼外伤门诊急诊与住院病房一体化管理模式。方法：中山大学中山眼科中心于2015年4月成立眼外伤急诊部，组建眼外伤急诊队伍，实现眼外伤门诊急诊与住院病房一体化管理，即眼外伤患者从门诊到病房的接诊、治疗、随访进行一体化管理，简化急诊诊疗流程，最大限度保证医疗护理质量。结果：眼外伤门诊急诊与住院病房一体化管理模式是一种以患者为中心的新型管理模式。该模式能保障急诊患者诊治的及时性、连贯性；缩短急诊患者就诊到等候手术的时间，提高患者就诊满意度；在保证医疗质量的同时，医护人力资源得到合理高效使用；并取得较好的社会效益与经济效益。结论：眼外伤门诊急诊与住院病房一体化管理模式具备长远发展及推广的价值。
Objective: To discuss the integrated management in emergency department and wards for patients of ocular trauma. Methods: The emergency department and the team were organized in April 2015 to simplify the process of treatment for patients of ocular trauma, and to improve the benefit and outcome for those patients. Results: The integrated management of emergency department and wards for patients of ocular trauma was a new management model focusing upon the benefit of patients. This model could guarantee the timeliness and continuity by reducing waiting time for diagnosis or operations. The integrated model had obvious economic and social benefits by improving quality of care and reasonably using human resource. Conclusion: TTe integrated management model in emergency department and wards for patients of ocular trauma is worthy of further application.
