目的：调查眼科学硕士研究生批判性思维能力的现况，并了解其相关因素。方法：采用中文版评判性思维能力测量表(Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version, CTDI-CV)对81名眼科学硕士研究生进行问卷调查，比较不同性别、年级、学位类别、学制的学生批判性思维能力的差异。结果：81名眼科学硕士研究生的CTDI-CV总分为(294.79±29.18)分，表明普遍具备积极的批判性思维能力，但“寻找真相”和“系统化能力”得分较低；不同年级与学位类型的眼科学硕士研究生的批判性思维能力等级分布存在差异。多因素线性回归显示，学位类型与眼科学硕士研究生的批判性思维能力相关。结论：眼科学硕士研究生普遍展现出正性的批判性思维特质，但在特定领域，其批判性思维能力仍有待提高，研究生教育应当采取针对性措施，培养研究生的批判性思维能力。

Objective: To investigate the current situation of critical thinking abilities of masters’ degree postgraduates in ophthalmology and identify the factors affecting the critical thinking abilities. Methods: Using the Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version (CTDI-CV), a questionnaire survey was conducted among 81 masters’ degree postgraduates in ophthalmology. Results: The average total score of the CTDI-CV for the 81 master’s degree postgraduates in ophthalmology was 294.79±29.18, indicating a general possession of positive critical thinking abilities, yet scores in “Truth Seeking” and “Systematicity” were relatively low. There are differences in critical thinking abilities among master’s degree postgraduates in ophthalmology of various grades and degree categories. Multivariate linear regression indicates that degree categories is correlated with the critical thinking abilities of ophthalmology graduate students. Conclusions: The masters’ degree postgraduates in ophthalmology generally exhibit positive traits of critical thinking, yet there is room for improvement in specific areas. Postgraduate education should adopt targeted measures to cultivate the critical thinking abilities of postgraduates.

培养合格的眼科医师对于防盲治盲工作、为人民提供优质眼健康服务是十分重要的，不同地区的住院医师规范化培训各有特点。文章从各个方面比较了内地与香港眼科住院医师规范化培训体系的异同，包括培训对象、培训师资、轮转阶段和要求、考核机制。香港的培训体系时间为6年，大致上相当于住院医师规范化培训和专科医师规范化培训结合在一起。通过比较两者的差异，有助于我们结合自己的实际情况，改进内地的眼科学住院医师教育培养体系，也为下一步开展眼科专科医师规范化培训提供参考。

The training of qualified ophthalmologists holds paramount significance in preventing blindness, treating eye diseases, and delivering optimal eye health services to the people. Given the unique nature of standardized residency training across geographical regions, this study delves into the comparative analysis of ophthalmology residency standardized training systems in the Mainland and Hong Kong. Specifically, we examine the the similarities and disparities in multiple facets, encompassing trainees' profiles, faculty expertise, rotation phases and prerequisites, as well as assessment methodologies. Notably, the training system in Hong Kong has a duration of 6 years, approximating the combined length of standardized residency training and standardized specialist training. By comparing the differences, we aim to facilitate the refinement of ophthalmology residency education and training in Mainland China, tailored to our specific context, while also serving as a reference for advancing standardized ophthalmology specialist training initiatives.