眼底影像专栏

一站式玻璃体腔注药中心成立前后效果评价

The evaluation of the effects before and after the establishment of a one-stop intravitreal injection center

:252-260
 
目的:探讨一站式玻璃体腔注药中心成立前后不同管理模式下的成效,分析其对患者就医时间和就医体验的影响。方法:采用回顾性临床研究。选择2023年1月—2024年3月在汕头大学·香港中文大学联 合汕头国际眼科中心接受玻璃体腔注药的2955例患者纳入研究。将2023年1月—2023年8月玻璃体腔注 药中心成立前接受玻璃体腔注药的1399例患者作为对照组;2023年9月—2024年3月玻璃体腔注药中心成立后接受玻璃体腔注药的1556例患者作为观察组。对照组采用常规日间手术流程,观察组成立一 站式玻璃体腔注药中心,优化诊疗和护理服务流程。通过使用问卷调查比较两组患者就医期间从预约手术、手术当天到术后复查各节点的等待时间、健康教育知晓率、患者满意度及不良事件发生率的差异。结果:问卷调查结果显示,对照组、观察组患者间预约等待手术时间分别为(3.93±2.98) d、 (1.34±2.38) d,手术时间分别为(2.53±2.11) min、(1.93±1.82) min,在院时间分别为(313.62±184.96) min、(85.43±34.14) min,术后复查耗时分别为(45.92±48.44) min、(25.82±16.21) min,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001);患者的总体健康教育知晓率成立前后分别为(95.50%、98.70%),差异有统计学意义 (χ2 =16.09,P<0.001);患者满意度调查结果显示,各项就医体验选项“非常满意”的占比成立后比 成立前明显提高。结论:一站式玻璃体腔注药中心护理模式简化了就医流程,极大地减少了患者就医期 间从预约手术、手术当天到术后复查各节点的等待时间、可显著提升工作效率,明显改善患者整体就 医体验。

To explore the application effects of different nursing models before and after the establishment of a one-stop intravitreal injection center, and to analyze their impact on patient's medical time and experience. Methods: A retrospective clinical study was conducted. From January 2023 to March 2024, 2955 patients who received anti-VEGF drug treatment at the Shantou International Eye Center, a joint initiative of Shantou University and the Chinese University of Hong Kong, were included in the study. The 1399 patients who received anti-VEGF drug treatment before the establishment of the intravitreal injection center from January 2023 to August 2023 were set as the control group; the 1556 patients who received anti-VEGF drug treatment after the establishment of the intravitreal injection center from September 2023 to March 2024 were set as the observation group. The control group followed the routine day surgery process, while the observation group established a one-stop intravitreal injection center to optimize the diagnosis, treatment, and nursing service process. A questionnaire survey was used to compare the differences in waiting time at various points from appointment to surgery, on the day of surgery, and postoperative review, health education awareness rate, patient satisfaction, and adverse event rate between the two groups. Results: The questionnaire survey showed that the waiting time for surgery between the control group and the observation group was (3.93±2.98) d, (1.34±2.38) d, respectively, the surgery time was (2.53±2.11) min, (1.93±1.82) mi, the in-hospital time was (313.62±184.96 min, 85.43±34.14) min, and the postoperative review time was (45.92±48.44) min, (25.82±16.21) min, with all differences being statistically significant (P <0.001); the overall health education awareness rate before and after the establishment was (95.50%, 98.70%), with a significant difference (P <0.001, χ2=16.09); the patient satisfaction survey showed that the proportion of "very satisfied" in various medical experience options was significantly higher after the establishment than before. Conclusions: The one-stop intravitreal injection center nursing model has simplified the medical process, greatly reducing the waiting time at various points from appointment to surgery, on the day of surgery, and postoperative review, significantly improving work efficiency, and significantly improving the overall medical experience of patients.

论著

EYESi模拟器结合Wet-lab在白内障手术培训中的效果评价

Effect evaluation of EYESi simulator combined with Wet-lab in cataract surgery training

:736-745
 
目的:比较单一EYESi虚拟手术模拟器(Dry-lab)、Wet-lab以及两种方式联合教学在超声乳化白内障吸除显微手术培训中的效果及差异,以期探索更科学高效的教学方式。方法:选取中山大学中山眼科中心接受住院医师规范化培训的1年级住院医师18名,随机分为Dry-lab组、Wet-lab组和联合组,每组各6人,分别接受8次有效Dry-lab训练、8次Wet-lab训练、4次有效Dry-lab训练联合4次Wet-lab训练。培训前后问卷调查评估三种教学方式的模拟效果与学员满意度,并在猪眼模型上考核超声乳化白内障吸除手术的三个主要步骤,以评估学员的培训效果。结果:Dry-lab与Wet-lab训练均能有效帮助学员学习使用显微器械,操作手感较好。但在立体感(P=0.007)、与人眼操作相比近似度(P<0.001)以及对掌握技术的帮助度(P=0.003)上,Wet-lab优于Dry-lab训练;而在缩短培训用时(P<0.001)上,Dry-lab培训更具优势。联合培训模式培训效果优于单一Wet-lab训练(P=0.014)和模拟器培训(P=0.012),整体满意度高于Wet-lab训练(P=0.042)和Dry-lab培训(P=0.042)。结论:Dry-lab与Wet-lab训练在超声乳化白内障吸除显微手术培训中各有优势,而两者相结合的教学模式更为高效,培训效果更佳,整体满意度高。
Objective: To compare the effects and distinctions among three methods of phacoemulsification training: EYESi simulator (Dry-lab), Wet-lab, and a combined approach, in order to find out more scientific and efficient teaching method. Methods: 18 first-year residents undergoing residency training at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yatsen University were randomly assigned to three groups: Dry-lab, Wet-lab, and Combined. Each group, consisting of 6 individuals, underwent a specific training regimen—8 sessions of effective simulator training for the Dry-lab group, 8 Wet-lab sessions for the Wet-lab group, and a combination of 4 effective simulator sessions with 4 Wet-lab sessions for the Combined group. The questionnaires were administered to assess simulation effects and student satisfaction before and after each training sessions. Additionally, the training effects were recorded in the three main steps of phacoemulsification cataract extraction surgery on a pig eye model. Results: Both the EYESi simulator and Wet-lab were proved to be effective in facilitating the learning of microscopic instrument use with commendable operating experience. However, Wet-lab is superior to the virtual simulator in terms of stereoscopic sensation (P=0.007), similarity to the human eye (P<0.001), and assistance in mastering techniques(P=0.003). Simulator training is found to be more advantageous in shortening the overall training time (P<0.001). The training effect of the joint training mode is better than that of single Wet-lab training (P=0.014) and simulator training (P=0.012), and the overall satisfaction is higher than that of Wet-lab training (P=0.042) and simulator training (P=0.042). Conclusion: The EYESi virtual surgery simulator and Wet-lab training have their advantages respectively in training for phacoemulsification cataract extraction microsurgery, and the combined teaching mode is more efficient, with better training effects and overall satisfaction.
论著

手术视频辅助Wetlab眼睑手术教学的效果评价

Assessment on the efficacy of video-assisted Wetlab eyelid surgery teaching

:496-503
 
目的:评价手术视频辅助Wetlab眼睑手术教学的效果。方法:回顾性分析2021年4月至2021年9月在中山大学中山眼科中心住院医师规范化培训学员中使用全眼模型开展Wetlab外眼手术教学的情况。对照组(12人)采用传统教学方法,实验组(15人)在传统教学方法的基础上引入手术视频辅助教学,对学员第3、6、9次练习视频进行评分,分析教学效果。结果:2组学员的基线水平与学习曲线相似,练习第3次到第6次之间评分提高快(对照组P3~6=0.001,实验组P3~6<0.001),第6次到第9次之间提高速度放缓(对照组P6~9=0.007,实验组P6~9=0.012)。对照组学员在练习第3次用时更长[(80.3±16.1) min],随着练习次数增多,用时逐渐缩短并保持稳定(P3~6=0.040,P6~9=0.886,P3~9=0.020),而实验组学员在练习第3次用时更短[(71.7±15.0) min],练习过程中保持稳定(P3~6=0.568,P3~9=0.519)。结论:手术视频辅助教学有助于学员熟悉手术操作,提高练习效率。
Objective: To assess the efficacy of video-assisted Wetlab eyelid surgery teaching. Methods: From April 2021 to September 2021, the porcine orbit model was used to conduct a Wetlab teaching course on eyelid surgeries among trainees of standardized training for residents in Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University. The control group (12 trainees) used conventional teaching methods. Video-assisted teaching was offered to the test group (15 trainees) based on conventional teaching methods. The videos records of the 3rd, 6th, and 9th practices were scored to analyze the teaching efficiency. Results: Trainees from the 2 groups showed a simila baseline and learning curve. Rapid improvement was found between the 3rd and 6th practice (P3–6=0.001 in control group, P3–6<0.001 in test group). The increment was slower between the 6th and 9th practice (P6–9=0.007 from control group, P6–9=0.012 from test group). Longer time was required by trainees from the control group at the 3rd practice [(80.3±16.1) min]. As they practiced more, the time required gradually decreased and remained stable (P3–6=0.040, P6–9=0.886, P3–9=0.020 from control group). Trainees from the test group spent less time at the 3rd practice [(71.7±15.0) min]. The time remained stable during all practices (P3–6=0.568, P3–9=0.519 from test group). Conclusion: Video-assisted teaching can help trainees get familiar with surgical operations and improve the efficiency of practices.
其他期刊
  • 眼科学报

    主管:中华人民共和国教育部
    主办:中山大学
    承办:中山大学中山眼科中心
    主编:林浩添
    主管:中华人民共和国教育部
    主办:中山大学
    浏览
  • Eye Science

    主管:中华人民共和国教育部
    主办:中山大学
    承办:中山大学中山眼科中心
    主编:林浩添
    主管:中华人民共和国教育部
    主办:中山大学
    浏览
推荐阅读
出版者信息