目的：分析某三甲眼科专科医院近5年临床诊疗涉及非手术常规血液检验项目的申请检测情况，为眼科医师了解检验辅助诊断概况、专科医院的实验室项目管理和开展新项目提供依据。方法：从中山大学中山眼科中心医学检验信息管理系统导出2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间到院申请进行血液检测的12 866例门诊患者的22 453份样本(共94 081项检验项目)相关检验记录。将申请检测科室及专科医师按照中华医学会眼科学分会推荐分为10个亚专科，对疾病诊断和检测项目等资料进行统计分析，采用文字、柱状图及折线图的形式进行描述。结果：5年间申请进行血液检测的12 866例门诊患者，男性患者6 356例(49.4%)，女性患者6 510例(50.6%)。基于首诊眼病诊断分类，排名前三位的眼病分别为眼整形/眼肿瘤病5 214例 (40.5%)、眼底病 3 487例(27.1%)、角膜病1 711例(13.3%)。申请检测样本量从2018年的3 163份增至2022年的5 903份，总体呈上升趋势。从申请的专科医师分析，眼整形/眼眶病专科医师申请单最多，有6 751份(占30.1%)，其中自身免疫性疾病检测所占比例最高，为49.1%，甲状腺疾病相关检测占41.9%；眼免疫专科医师申请检测量为4 214份(占18.8%)，以自身免疫性疾病检测为主占55.7%，感染性项目检测占32.5%；眼底病专科医师申请检测量为3 629份(16.2%)，其中自身免疫性疾病检测和感染性项目检测分别占47.8%和39.6%；角膜病专科医师申请数为1 436份(占6.4%)，其中过敏性疾病检测比例为41.2%。基于一份申请单可同时检测多个项目，眼整形/眼眶专科申请检测总项最多，有33 513项，甲状腺疾病检测占65.0%；角膜病专科申请16 482项，过敏性疾病检测占83.4%，眼底病专科和眼免疫专科分别为8 794项和8 047项，均以自身免疫性疾病检测为主，分别占42.5%和40.4%。结论：眼科专科医院中非手术常规检验项目在各亚专科的申请数量明显分布不均，项目构成受亚专科疾病特点的影响。眼科实验室应针对性加强非手术常规检测项目的宣传和管理。
Objective: To analyze the application and testing of non-surgical routine blood test items in clinical diagnosis and treatment in a top-tier ophthalmic hospital over the past five years, providing ophthalmologists with insights into the overview of laboratory-assisted diagnosis, laboratory project management in specialized hospitals, and the basis for launching new projects. Methods: Relevant test records of 22,453 samples (totaling 94,081 test items) from 12,866 outpatient patients who applied for blood tests at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center of Sun Yat-sen University from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022, were retrieved from the medical laboratory information management system. The departments applying for tests and specialist physicians were divided into 10 subspecialties according to the recommendations of the Ophthalmology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association. Statistical analysis was performed on disease diagnosis and test items, and the results were described in the form of text, bar graphs, and line graphs. Results: Among the 12,866 outpatient patients who applied for blood tests over the five-year period, 6,356 (49.4%) were male and 6,510 (50.6%) were female. Based on the classification of first-visit ophthalmic diseases, the top three were ophthalmic plastic surgery/ocular tumor diseases (5,214 cases, 40.5%), fundus diseases (3,487 cases, 27.1%), and corneal diseases (1,711 cases, 13.3%). The number of samples applied for testing increased from 3,163 in 2018 to 5,903 in 2022, showing an overall upward trend. From the perspective of specialist physicians applying for tests, ophthalmic plastic surgery/orbital disease specialists had the highest number of applications, with 6,751 (30.1%), among which autoimmune disease testing accounted for the highest proportion, at 49.1%, and thyroid disease-related testing accounted for 41.9%. The number of applications from ophthalmic immunology specialists was 4,214 (18.8%), with autoimmune disease testing accounting for 55.7% and infectious disease testing accounting for 32.5%. The number of applications from fundus disease specialists was 3,629 (16.2%), with autoimmune disease testing and infectious disease testing accounting for 47.8% and 39.6%, respectively. The number of applications from corneal disease specialists was 1,436 (6.4%), with allergic disease testing accounting for 41.2%. Since multiple tests could be performed on a single application, the ophthalmic plastic surgery/orbital disease subspecialty had the highest total number of tests applied for, with 33,513 tests, of which thyroid disease testing accounted for 65.0%. The corneal disease subspecialty applied for 16,482 tests, with allergic disease testing accounting for 83.4%. The fundus disease subspecialty and ophthalmic immunology subspecialty respectively applied for 8,794 and 8,047 tests, both primarily focused on autoimmune disease testing, accounting for 42.5% and 40.4%, respectively. Conclusions: The number of applications for non-surgical routine test items in ophthalmic specialized hospitals is significantly unevenly distributed among various subspecialties, and the composition of the items is influenced by the characteristics of diseases in each subspecialty. Ophthalmic laboratories should strengthen the promotion and management of non-surgical routine test items in a targeted manner.
目的：构建具有较强科学性和实用性的眼科专科护士培训体系，为眼科专科护士的准入、培养、考核提供理论基础。方法：通过查阅文献、焦点小组和专家会议法，拟定眼科专科护士培训体系的课程、带教、评价体系。结果：构建的眼科专科护士培训体系内容包括课程体系、培训过程、临床实践指标、考核评价方法4个部分。其中，课程体系部分包含一级指标5项，二级指标11项，三级指标55项；培训过程包括一级指标4项、二级指标12项；临床实践指标包括一级指标6项、二级指标23项；考核评价方法包括一级指标5项、二级指标10项。结论：眼科专科护士培训体系构建过程科学，内容设置合理，对开展专科护士培训具有较好的指导意义。
Objective: To develop a scientific and practical training system for ophthalmic specialist nurses and provide theoratical basis for the the admission, training and assessment of ophthalmic specialist nurses. Methods: Through extensive review of domestic and foreign literatures, a focus group interview and an expert meeting, the curriculum, teaching and evaluation system of the ophthalmic specialist nurses training system was developed.Results: The training system for ophthalmic specialist nurses consists of four parts: training content, training process, clinical practice, assessment and evaluation. Among them, the training content includes 5 first-level indicators, 11 second-level indicators and 55 third-level indicators. The training process of ophthalmic specialist nurses includes 4 indicators of the first level and 12 indicators of the second level. The clinical practice indexes of ophthalmic specialist nurses include 6 indexes of the first grade and 23 indexes of the second grade. The methods of assessment and evaluation of ophthalmic specialist nurses include 5 indicators of the first level and 10 indicators of the second level. Conclusion: The scientific process and reasonable content of the training system for ophthalmic specialist nurses have a good guiding significance for the training of ophthalmic specialist nurses.
目的：构建具有较强科学性和实用性的眼科专科护士培训体系，为眼科专科护士的准入、培养、考核提供理论基础。方法：通过查阅文献、焦点小组和专家会议法，拟定眼科专科护士培训体系的课程、带教、评价体系。结果：构建的眼科专科护士培训体系内容包括课程体系、培训过程、临床实践指标、考核评价方法4个部分。其中，课程体系部分包含一级指标5项，二级指标11项，三级指标55项；培训过程包括一级指标4项、二级指标12项；临床实践指标包括一级指标6项、二级指标23项；考核评价方法包括一级指标5项、二级指标10项。结论：眼科专科护士培训体系构建过程科学，内容设置合理，对开展专科护士培训具有较好的指导意义。
Objective: To develop a scientific and practical training system for ophthalmic specialist nurses and provide theoratical basis for the the admission, training and assessment of ophthalmic specialist nurses. Methods: Through extensive review of domestic and foreign literatures, a focus group interview and an expert meeting, the curriculum, teaching and evaluation system of the ophthalmic specialist nurses training system was developed. Results: The training system for ophthalmic specialist nurses consists of four parts: training content, training process, clinical practice, assessment and evaluation. Among them, the training content includes 5 first-level indicators, 11 second-level indicators and 55 third-level indicators. The training process of ophthalmic specialist nurses includes 4 indicators of the first level and 12 indicators of the second level. The clinical practice indexes of ophthalmic specialist nurses include 6 indexes of the first grade and 23 indexes of the second grade. The methods of assessment and evaluation of ophthalmic specialist nurses include 5 indicators of the first level and 10 indicators of the second level. Conclusion: The scientific process and reasonable content of the training system for ophthalmic specialist nurses have a good guiding significance for the training of ophthalmic specialist nurses.
