目的:研究增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变患者玻璃体基质细胞衍生因子(Strmalcell-derivedfactor-1,SDF-1)和血管内皮生长因子(Vascular endothelial growth factor，VECF)的浓度,及其相互作用关系。方法:酶联免疫吸附法(Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,ELISA)检测玻璃体内 SDF-1 和 VEGF 的含量,每个标本重复 3 次。实验组为增性糖尿病视网膜病变(Proliferalive diabeticretinopathy,PDR)的住院患者 30 例,对照组为同期行玻璃体切除术的特发性黄斑裂孔患者 12 例。结果: PDR 患者玻璃体 VECF 的平均浓度为(2865.87+387.85)pg/ml,明显高于特发性黄斑裂孔组[(142.42+21.03)pg/ml，P < 0.0001]。增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变患者玻璃体 SDF-1的含量平均为(298.40+24.57)pg/ml,对照组为(86.91+15.89)pg/ml,两组的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.0001)。在 30 例PDR患者玻璃体内 VEGF 和 SDF-1 的含量表现为正相关(Peanson相关系数r=0.62，P < 0.001)。结论:增殖性糖尿病患者玻璃体 SDF-1 和 VECF 的含量均高于非糖尿病患者,提示 SDF-1 和 VEGF 共同参与了增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变患者病理性新生血管的形成过程。
Purpose:To investigate the levels of stromal cell-derived factor-1(SDF-1) andvascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the vitreous of patients with proliferativediabetic retinopathy.
Methods: The levels of $DF-1 and VEGF in the vitreous of 30 eyes of 30 patients withproliferative diabetic retinopathy(PDR)and 12 eyes of 12 patients with idiopathicmacular hole ( MH) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Vitreousfluid samples were obtained by vitrectomy.
Resuls:The vitreous concentration of VEGF was signifcantly higher in eyes with PDR(2 865.87+387.85 pg/ml) than in eyes with idiopathic macular hole (142.42+21.03 Pgml, P< 0.000 1). The vitreous level of SDF-1 was also significantly higher in eyes withPDR (298.40+24.57 pg/ml ) than in eyes with idiopathic macular hole (86.91+15.89Pg/ml, P< 0.000 1 ). The vitreous concentration of SDF-1 correlated significantly with that of VEGF in eyes with PDR( [correlation coefficient]r=0.62,P<0 .001)
Conclution:Vitreous levels of both SDF-1 and VEGF in patients with PDR aresignificantly higher than those of nondiabetic patients. SDF-1 may be correlated withVEGF in angiogenesis in PDR.
玻璃体淀粉样变性是一种罕见的眼病, 可独立发病, 也可以表现为系统性淀粉样变性的眼部受累, 常有家族史。报道 1 例遗传性玻璃体淀粉样变性患者, 中年发病, 双眼先后受累,有明确的家族史。双眼均行玻璃体切除术。术后病理检查结果显示: 玻璃体呈刚果红染色阳性, 电镜下发现纤维丝状物。对患者外周血进行 DNA 抽提, PCR 扩增, 克隆、筛选及测序等一系列基因检测, 发现转甲蛋白(Transthyretin, TTR) 存在着基因突变, 突变点 Gly83Arg, 这可能是玻璃体淀粉样变性发病的一个新的突变位点。
Vitreous amyloidosis is a rare condition that mainly occurs in Familial Amyloidotic Polyneuropathy (FAP). In some cases, it may be the only symptom without systemic disorders. One case of familial vitreous amyloidosis was reported here, with white, wispy opacities in vitreous cavity in both eyes. Pars plana vitrectomy and histopathological examination of the vitreous specimens were performed. The vitreous specimens showed typical microscopic features of amyloidosis with Congo red stain and non-branching fibrils on a transmission electron microscope. Transthyretin (TTR) gene was amplified with DNA isolated from the peripheral blood cells. Bi-directional sequencing of exon 3 showed a single base-pair substitution, which results in an amino acid substitution at position83, glycine to arginine (TTR Arg-83) . TTR Arg-83 may be a new pathologic mutation in vitreous amyloidosis.
目的：对儿童癔症性视力障碍的病因进行分析，比较试镜与人工泪液给药治疗的疗效。方法：纳入2013年10月至2020年10月以“癔症性突发视力下降”于深圳市儿童医院门诊就诊的36例患儿，其中男16例，女20例。按随机原则分为试镜组与人工泪液给药组。两组在治疗过程中都辅以语言暗示。两组治疗的首次有效率采用SPSS17.0软件Fisher精确概率检验。分析儿童癔症性视力障碍的发病原因，提出诊断要点和防治对策。结果：在辅以语言暗示的前提下，试镜组人工泪液给药组治疗方案的首次有效率分别为94.4%、83.3%，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在相关病因分析中，学习压力相关的有20例，占55.6%，包括成绩下降、逃避考试、因成绩受到家长或老师的训斥，甚至体罚。家庭变故13例，占36.1%，父母离异为主要原因。留守儿童不愿返乡、同学纠纷、校园霸凌以及外伤等为其他原因。结论：试镜加语言暗示比人工泪液加语言暗示更能有效提高癔症性视力障碍的首次治疗有效率。学习压力、家庭变故相关因素为癔症性视力障碍的最常见原因
Objective: To analyze the causes of hysterical visual impairment in children, and to compare the efficacy of two treatments of trial frame and artificial tears administration. Methods: A total of 36 children with sudden hysterical visual impairment admitted to Shenzhen Children’s Hospital from October 2013 to October 2020 were enrolled in our study, including 16 males and 20 females. They were randomly divided into trial frame group and artificial tears group. Both groups were supplemented with verbal suggestion during the treatment. The primary effective rates of the two groups were compared by SPSS 17.0 Fisher’s exact test. The causes of hysterical visual impairment in children were analyzed, and the main points of specific diagnostic tests and treatments were summarized. Results: The primary effective rate of the trial frame group and the artificial tears group were 94.4% and 83.3% respectively.Thedifference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In this study, therewere 20 cases (55.6%) related to study pressure, including decline in academic performance, evasion of exams, reprimand by parents or teachers, and even corporal punishment. There were 13 cases (36.1%) caused by family accidents, and parents’ divorce was the main reason. Leftover children unwilling to return hometown, classmate disputes, campus bullying and trauma were other reasons. Conclusion: Trialframe is more effective than artificial tears therapy in improving primary effective rate of hysterical visual impairment. Study pressure, family accident are the most common causes of hysterical visual impairment
