目的：系统分析脑卒中后视野缺损患者干预方案的相关研究，识别、归纳及总结干预的具体内容、结局指标和干预效果，为临床实践及未来该领域研究提供参考。方法：采用范围综述研究框架，系统检索中国知网、维普数据库、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane Library共9个数据库。检索时限为建库至2024年4月10日。对纳入文献进行筛选、汇总和分析。结果：最终纳入12篇文献，总结脑卒中后视野缺损患者干预方法及结局指标，干预方法包括替代性干预、补偿性干预、恢复性干预等，结局指标包括日常生活活动能力、日常生活扩展活动能力、阅读表现、视野检查等。结论：目前针对脑卒中后视野缺损患者的干预方案内容多样化、证据质量较低、结局指标不统一，有待进一步开展高质量研究探索最佳训练计划和规范结局指标。未来应不断改进、优化康复策略，建立最佳的多学科结构，制定科学、系统、个性化方案。

Objective: To systematically analyze the related studies on intervention schemes for patients with visual field defects after stroke, and to identify, summarize, and summarize the specific content, outcome indicators, and intervention effects, thereby providing a reference for clinical practice and future research in this field. Methods: Utilizing the scoping review method, a systematic search was conducted in 9 databases: CNKI, CQVIP, Wanfang Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library. The search encompassed the period from the inception of each database to April 10, 2024. The selected literature was subsequrently screened, summarized, and analyzed. Results: A total of 12 articles were finally included, summarizing the intervention methods and outcome indicators for patients with visual field defects after stroke. The intervention methods comprised alternative intervention, compensatory intervention, and rehabilitative interventions. Outcome indicators include daily living activities, daily living extended activities, reading performance and visual field examination. Conclusion: Current intervention schemes for patients with visual field defects after stroke exhibit diverse content, charaterized by low evidence quality and inconsistent outcome indicators. Further high-quality research is needed to explore optimal training plans and standardize the outcome indicators. In the future, continuous improvement and optimization of rehabilitation strategies should be carried out to establish the best multidisciplinary framework and formulate scientific, systematic and individualized plans.

目的：测量黄斑区视网膜神经节细胞层和内界膜-视网膜色素上皮层厚度，分析其与新发缺血性脑卒中的相关性。方法：采用前瞻性研究，选择2021年12月至2022年3月在潍坊医学院附属医院体检的健康者30例(60眼)为对照组(A组)；选择同期收治且年龄匹配的新发缺血性脑卒中患者30例(60眼)为卒中组(B组)。比较两组黄斑区神经节细胞层(ganglion cell layer,GCL)和内界膜-视网膜色素上皮层(inner limiting membrane-Retinal pigment epithelium,ILM-RPE)厚度及平均GCL厚度/ILM-RPE平均容积厚度(GCL/ILM-RPE厚度比)。结果：共纳入120只眼，A、B组分别60只眼。A组的平均GCL为(83.5±4.7)μm，B组的平均GCL厚度为(78.7±10.5)μm，组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。A组的GCL最小厚度为(80.4±4.4)μm，B组的GCL最小厚度为(70.7±16.3)μm，组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。A组的ILM-RPE中心子区厚度为(247.5±19.8)μm，B组的ILM-RPE中心子区厚度为(241.6±36.3)μm，组间比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.393)。A组的ILM-RPE平均容积厚度为278.4±9.8μm，B组的ILM-RPE平均容积厚度为(278.5±15.3)μm，组间比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.448)。A组的GCL/ILM-RPE厚度比为0.300 3±0.012 2，B组的GCL/ILM-RPE厚度比为0.286 2±0.028 6，组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论：缺血性脑卒中影响GCL厚度和GCL/ILM-RPE厚度比， GCL厚度和GCL/ILM-RPE厚度比与新发缺血性脑卒中可能有关。

Objective: To measure the thickness of retinal ganglion cell layer and inner limiting membrane-retinal pigment epithelium layer in the macular region, and analyze its correlation with new-onset ischemic stroke. Methods: By using a prospective study, 30 healthy subjects (60 eyes) who underwent physical examination in Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University from December 2021 to March 2022 were selected as the control group (Group A). Thirty age-matched patients with new-onset ischemic stroke admitted at the same time (60 eyes) were selected as the stroke group (Group B). The ganglioncelllayer (GCL) and innerlimitingmembrane-Retinalpigmentepithelium (ILM-RPE) were compared between the two groups. It included the thickness and mean GCL thickness/Mean Volume thickness of ILM-RPE (GCL/ILM-RPE thickness ratio). Results: A total of 120 eyes were included, with 60 eyes in group A and B. The average GCL thickness in group A was (83.5±4.7) μm, and the average GCL thickness in group B was (78.7±10.5) μm,and the difference between groups was statistically significant (P<0.001). The minimum thickness of GCL in group A was (80.4±4.4) μm, and the minimum thickness of GCL in group B was (70.7±16.3) μm, showing statistical significance(P<0.001). The thickness of the central subregion of ILM-RPE in group A was (247.5±19.8) μm, and the thickness of the central subregion of ILM-RPE in group B was (241.6±36.3) μm, and the difference was not statistically significant between two groups (P=0.393). The mean volumetric thickness of ILM-RPE in group A was (278.4±9.8) μm, and the mean volumetric thickness of ILM-RPE in group B was (278.5±15.3) μm, and the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.448). The GCL/ILM-RPE thickness ratio of group A was (0.300 3±0.012 2), and that of group B was (0.286 2±0.028 6), showing a statistical difference between groups (P<0.001). Conclusion: Ischemic stroke affects the GCL thickness and the thickness ratio of GCL/ILM-RPE, which may be related to new-onset ischemic stroke.