目的：探讨思政引领教学法在五年制临床定向医学生眼科学见习中的应用效果。方法：研究于2023年3月在首都医科大学石景山教学医院进行，选取该年度参加见习的37名五年制临床定向医学生为研究对象。研究将见习课程随机分为两组：传统思政教学法组和思政引领教学法组。传统思政教学法组在第一次见习课中采用传统方式，涵盖眼的组织解剖、视神经和视路疾病、眼外肌疾病与弱视、眼外伤等内容；思政引领教学法组则在第二次见习课中采用新的教学方法，涵盖眼表疾病、外眼疾病、眼视光学、视网膜病等内容。见习结束后，通过试卷测试评估学生的眼科理论知识、见习技能及思政应用能力，并采用李克特十级量表评估学生对思政教学的认知及满意度。结果：思政引领教学法组在思政成绩(9.29±0.37 vs. 6.83±0.50)和总成绩(85.14±4.84 vs. 81.86±4.94)上均优于传统思政教学法组(P <0.05)，且在李克特十级量表6个维度的评分中均显著更高(P 均<0.001)；在眼科理论知识和见习技能方面，思政引领教学法组成绩均高于传统思政教学法组，但差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论：思政引领教学法能显著提升学生对课程思政的认知、接受度和满意度，是一种有效的医学教育课程思政实践方式。通过将思政元素系统化地融入眼科见习课程，不仅可以增强学生的思政素养，还能提升其职业责任感和服务意识，为培养适应基层医疗需求的高素质医学人才提供了有力支持。

Objective: To explore the application effects of  ideological and political education (IPE)-led teaching methods in ophthalmology clerkship among five-year clinical medicine students with directional training. Methods: The study was conducted in March 2023 in the Shijingshan Teaching Hospital of Capital Medical University. A total of 37 fiveyear clinical medicine students with directional training who participated in the clerkship in that academic year were selected as the research subjects. The clerkship courses were randomly divided into two groups: the traditional IPE teaching method group and the IPE - led teaching method group. The traditional IPE teaching method group adopted the traditional teaching approach in the first internship session, covering topics such as the histological anatomy of the eye, diseases of the optic nerve and visual pathway, extraocular muscle diseases and amblyopia, and ocular trauma. The IPE-led teaching method group employed a new teaching method in the second internship session, covering topics such as ocular surface diseases, external eye diseases, optometry, and retinal diseases. Following the clerkship, students' ophthalmology theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and IPE application abilities were assessed through written examinations, and their perceptions and satisfaction with the IPE teaching were evaluated using a 10-point Likert scale. Results: The IPE - led teaching method group demonstrated significantly higher scores in IPE performance (9.29±0.37 vs. 6.83±0.50) and overall performance (85.14±4.84 vs. 81.86±4.94) compared with the traditional IPE teaching method group (P < 0.05), and significantly higher ratings across all six dimensions of the 10-point Likert scale (all P < 0.001). In terms of ophthalmology theoretical knowledge and clinical skills during the clerkship, the IPE - led teaching method group achieved higher scores than the traditional IPE teaching method group, but the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The IPE-led teaching method significantly enhances cognition, acceptance, and satisfaction among students with IPE. This approach effectively integrates ideological and political elements into medical education. By systematically embedding them into the ophthalmology internship curriculum, it enhances students’ ideological literacy, professional responsibility, and service awareness, thereby supporting the cultivation of high-caliber medical talents equipped for grassroots healthcare.