目的：比较不同预设光学区组的飞秒激光小切口基质透镜取出术(small incision lenticule extraction，SMILE)和飞秒激光制瓣联合准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileuses，FS-LASIK)术后有效光学区(effective optical zone，EOZ)大小与角膜高阶像差(high order aberrations，HOAs)变化以及有效光学区大小对角膜高阶像差的影响。方法：收集2019年2月 至2020年5月来佛山市第二人民医院行激光手术的患者80例，均取右眼入组，SMILE组43例，FSLASIK组37例，按预设光学区大小分为6.5 mm和6.0 mm组，分别于术前和术后1个月应用Pentacam三维眼前节分析系统测量有效光学区及总角膜高阶像差、彗差、球差，分析不同预设光学区下SMILE组和FS-LASIK组有效光学大小及与角膜高阶像差的关系。结果：在相同预设光学区下，术后1个月SMILE组的有效光学区均大于FS-LASIK组，差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)，且SMILE组的角膜总高阶像差、球差、彗差均较FS-LASIK组低，差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)；对于相同手术方式，预设光学区6.0 mm较6.5 mm组，术后1个月角膜总高阶像差、球差、彗差均升高，差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论：SMILE组和FS-LASIK组术后1个月的有效光学区均小于预设光学区，SMILE组大于FS-LASIK组；术后1个月有效光学区越大，角膜高阶像差越小；在相同预设光学区下，SMILE组术后1个月角膜高阶像差小于FS-LASIK组。

Objective: To compare the effective optical zone (EOZ) and the changes in corneal high order aberrations (HOAs) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with those after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileuses (FS-LASIK). Methods: This study included 80 subjects who underwent laser refractive surgery at the Second People’s Hospital of Foshan between February 2019 and May 2020. Only data from the right eye of each subject were analyzed. A total of 43 eyes underwent SMILE while 37 eyes received FS-LASIK. The eyes were further stratified into subgroups based on different programmed optical zones: the 6.5 mm group and the 6.0 mm group. EOZ, coma, and spherical aberration were measured with Pentacam 3D anterior segment analysis system preoperatively and one month postoperatively. In addition, the relationship between EOZ and corneal HOAs was analyzed and compared between different optical-zone groups after SMILE and FS-LASIK. Results: For the same programmed optical zone, the SMILE group achieved a significantly greater EOZ than the FS-LASIK group who was measured 1-month postoperatively did (P<0.05). Meanwhile, corneal HOAs, spherical aberration, and coma in the SMILE group are significantly lower than those in the FS-LASIK group (P<0.05). For the same procedure (SMILE or FS-LASIK), the 6.0 mm group demonstrated significantly higher corneal total HOAs, spherical aberration, and coma than the 6.5 mm group did 1-month after the surgery (P<0.05). Conclusion: In both the SMILE and the FS-LASIK groups, 1-month postoperative EOZ was smaller than the programmed optical zone. EOZ in the SMILE group was larger than that in the FS-LASIK group. The larger the 1-month postoperative EOZ was, the lower corneal HOAs were. For the same programmed optical zone, 1-month postoperative corneal HOAs in the SMILE group is lower than that in the FS-LASIK group.