Abstract: Hereditary, metabolic and toxic optic neuropathies cause bilateral, central vision loss and therefore can result in severe impairment in visual function. Accurate, early diagnosis is critical, as nutritional and toxic optic neuropathies may be reversible if identified early, and diagnosis of hereditary optic neuropathies can prevent unnecessary invasive workup, provide prognostic information, and allow for effective genetic counseling. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a valuable tool that aids in the diagnosis and prognostication of optic neuropathies as it allows for quantification of changes in the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) over time. We review the characteristic clinical presentations of hereditary, metabolic and toxic optic neuropathies, with an emphasis on OCT findings.
Perception is the ability to see, hear, or become aware of external stimuli through the senses. Visual stimuli are electromagnetic waves that interact with the eye and elicit a sensation. Sensations, indeed, imply the detection, resolution, and recognition of objects and images, and their accuracy depends on the integrity of the visual system. In clinical practice, evaluating the integrity of the visual system relies greatly on the assessment of visual acuity, that is to say on the capacity to identify a signal. Visual acuity, indeed, is of utmost importance for diagnosing and monitoring ophthalmological diseases. Visual acuity is a function that detects the presence of a stimulation (a signal) and resolves its detail(s). This is the case of a symbol like “E”: the stimulus is detected, then it is resolved as three horizontal bars and a vertical bar. In fact, within the clinical setting visual acuity is usually measured with alphanumeric symbols and is a three-step process that involves not only detection and resolution, but, due to the semantic content of letters and numbers, their recognition. Along with subjective (psychophysical) procedures, objective methods that do not require the active participation of the observer have been proposed to estimate visual acuity in non-collaborating subjects, malingerers, or toddlers. This paper aims to explain the psychophysical rationale underlying the measurement of visual acuity and revise the most common procedures used for its assessment.