目的：评估超脉冲二氧化碳(CO₂)激光治疗不同类型眼睑肿物的疗效和安全性。方法：纳入50例眼睑肿物患者，其中男12例、女38例。患者年龄4~84岁。肿物类型包括眼睑色素痣、睑黄瘤、分裂痣、眼睑疣等，其中25例累及眼睑灰线，10例肿物直径>10 mm。所有患者接受超脉冲CO₂激光治疗，并进行术后随访。治疗效果通过术后数码照片评估，同时记录术后1个月并发症发生情况。结果：50例眼睑肿物总体治愈率为92%，有效率达到100%。4例眼睑色素痣在治疗后1个月内复发。术后并发症主要包括轻微倒睫(5例)、睫毛稀疏部分缺失(4例)和瘢痕增生及色素沉着(4例)，未出现其他严重并发症。结论：对于眼睑肿物，特别是睑缘肿物及大肿物，超脉冲CO₂激光是一种更为精确、微创、安全有效的治疗方法，可作为眼睑肿物治疗的优选方案。

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrapulse carbon dioxide (CO₂) laser in the treatment for various types of eyelid tumors. Methods: A total of 50 patients, including 12 males and 38 females,with eyelid tumors were included in the study The age range is  from 4 to 84 years, with an average age of 37.9±20.0 years. The tumors found in our study include eyelid pigmented nevus, xanthelasma, divided nevus, and molluscum. Among them, 25 cases involved the gray line of the eyelid,and 10 cases had a tumor diameter greater than 10 mm. All patients underwent ultrapulse CO₂ laser treatment and postoperative follow-up. The treatment outcomes were assessed through digital photos, and complications were recorded one month after surgery. Results: The total cure rate of the 50 cases of eyelid tumors in our study was 92%, with the effective rate reaching 100%. 4 cases of eyelid pigmented nevi recurred within one month after treatment, while all other patients were cured. Postoperative complications mainly included minor trichiasis (5 cases), partial sparse to absent eyelashes (4 cases), and hypertrophic scar with hyperpigmentation (4 cases). No other serious complications were reported in our study. Conclusions: For eyelid tumors, especially eyelid margin and larger tumors, the ultrapulse CO₂ laser is a more precise, minimally invasive, safe and effective treatment method. It can be used as a preferred treatment option for eyelid tumors, and should be promoted widely in clinical practice.

眶尖部肿瘤为眼科罕见疾病，但因其所处位置特殊，对机体，特别是视神经功能危害极大，错误的诊断、不规范合理的治疗不仅不能解决问题，甚至会对机体造成严重的不可挽回的损害。目前针对眶尖部肿瘤的诊断、治疗多建立在医生的主观认知与经验的基础上，尚未达成共识。本文通过分析眶尖部肿瘤的临床特点，结合以往漏诊、误诊、误治的临床案例，阐述眶尖肿瘤正确诊断的关键要点；同时，结合不同临床案例，客观分析治疗方案，尤其是手术方式、路径，为眶尖部肿瘤的合理化治疗提供依据，以期规范眶尖部肿瘤的诊断和治疗，提高治疗成功率。

Although orbital apical tumor is a rare ophthalmic disease, its special location can cause great harm to the body, especially to the function of the optic nerve. Misdiagnosis and improper treatment are not only unable to solve the problem, but also irretrievably harmful to the body. At present, there is no consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of orbital apical tumors, which are mostly based on subjective cognition and experience of doctors. In this paper, the clinical characters of orbital apical tumors were analyzed through the past clinical cases of misdiagnosis and mistreatment, and the key points of proper diagnosis of orbital apical tumors were expounded. Meanwhile, by combining with different clinical cases, the treatment plans, especially the surgical approaches, were analysed to provide a basis for the appropriate treatment of orbital apical tumors, in order to standardize the diagnosis and treatment of orbital apex tumor, and improve the success rate of treatment.

目的：观察盐酸艾司氯胺酮联合丙泊酚在小儿眼睑肿物刮除术中的临床应用效果，评价盐酸艾司氯胺酮联合丙泊酚在小儿眼睑肿物刮除术麻醉中的有效性和安全性。方法：选择2020年11月至2021年7月在佛山市第二人民医院择期行眼睑肿物刮除术的70例患儿，随机分为A组和B组，每组35例。A组采用七氟烷联合丙泊酚复合麻醉，B组采用盐酸艾司氯胺酮联合丙泊酚复合麻醉。记录两组患儿诱导时间、手术时间、苏醒时间、复苏总时间；监测麻醉前、麻醉后5 min、手术开始前、手术结束后患儿血流动力学及呼吸频率变化；记录两组患儿苏醒后即刻、返回病房即刻的东安大略儿童医院疼痛评分量表(Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale，CHEOPS)疼痛评分、躁动评分、恶心呕吐评分。结果：两组患儿麻醉诱导时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；两组患儿麻醉过程中血流动力学水平、呼吸频率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；B组患儿苏醒时间、复苏总时间均明显低于A组(P<0.05)；B组患儿苏醒后即刻及返回病房即刻CHEOPS疼痛评分、躁动评分、恶心呕吐评分均明显低于A组(P<0.05)。另外，B组患儿术后出现恶心呕吐概率低于A组(P<0.05)。结论：盐酸艾司氯胺酮联合丙泊酚应用于小儿眼睑肿物刮除术麻醉，能提供良好麻醉镇痛效果，降低躁动反应和恶心呕吐的发生

Objective: To investigate the anesthetic effect and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination application of esketamine and propofol in curettage of eyelid tumors of children. Methods: This study selected 70 children who underwent elective eyelid tumor curettage in Foshan Second People’s Hospital from November 2020 to July 2021. They were randomly divided into group A and group B, with 35 cases in each group. Patients in Group A were anesthetized with sevoflurane combined with propofol. Patients in Group B were anesthetized with esketamine combined with propofol. The anesthetic induction time, operation time, recovery time and total recovery time of the two groups were recorded. The haemodynamics and respiratory frequency changes of patients were being monitored before anesthesia, 5 minutes after anesthesia, before the operation and after the operation. The scores of Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) pain, agitation and nausea and vomiting were recorded immediately after the patients awakened and were sent back to the ward. Results: There was no significant difference in anesthesia induction time between the two groups (P>0.05). There was also no significant difference in the haemodynamics and respiratory frequency changes during the anaesthetic process between the two groups (P>0.05). The recovery time and total recovery time in group B were significantly lower than those in group A (P<0.05). The scores of CHEOPS pain, agitation and nausea and vomiting in group B were significantly lower than those in group A immediately after the patients awakened and were sent back to the ward (P<0.05). Besides, the probability of nausea and vomiting after curettage of eyelid tumors was lower in group B than in group A (P<0.05). Conclusion: Combination application of esketamine and propofol in curettage of eyelid tumors of children can provide good anesthetic and analgesic effect and reduce the occurrence of restlessness, nausea and vomiting.