目的：开发一款可自动校准测试距离的智能手机视力检测APP(WHOeye的iOS版本)，并评估其实用性。方法： WHOeyes在经过验证的视力检测APP “V@home”的基础上新增自动距离校准(automatic distance calibration, ADC)功能。研究招募了3组不同年龄(≤20岁、20~40岁、>40岁)的中国受试者，分别使用糖尿病视网膜病变早期治疗研究(Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, ETDRS)视力表和WHOeyes进行远距离和近距离的视力检测。ADC功能用于确定WHOeyes的测试距离。红外测距仪用于确定ETDRS的测试距离以及WHOeyes的实际测试距离。通过问卷调查评估用户满意度。结果：WHOeyes ADC确定的实际测试距离在3个年龄组中均与预期测试距离总体上表现出良好的一致性(P > 0.50)。在远距离和近距离视力检测方面，WHOeyes的准确性与ETDRS相当。WHOeyes与ETDRS之间的平均视力差异范围为–0.084 ~ 0.012 log^MAR，各组的二次加权卡帕系数(quadratic weighted kappa, QWK)均大于0.75。WHOeyes在近距离和远距离视力检测中的重测信度高，平均差异范围为–0.040 ~ 0.004 log^MAR，QWK均大于0.85。问卷调查显示WHOeyes具有较好的用户体验和接受度。结论：与金标准ETDRS视力表方法相比，WHOeyes测试距离较为准确，可以提供准确的远距离和近距离视力测量结果。

Background: To develop and assess usability of a smartphone-based visual acuity (VA) test with an automatic distance calibration (ADC) function, the iOS version of WHOeyes. Methods: The WHOeyes was an upgraded version with a distinct feature of ADC of an existing validated VA testing APP called V@home. Three groups of Chinese participants with different ages (≤20, 20-40, >40 years) were recruited for distance and near VA testing using both an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart and the WHOeyes. The ADC function would determine the testing distance. Infrared rangefinder was used to determine the testing distance for the ETDRS, and actual testing distance for the WHOeyes. A questionnaire-based interview was administered to assess satisfaction. Results: The actual testing distance determined by the WHOeyes ADC showed an overall good agreement with the desired testing distance in all three age groups (p > 0.50). Regarding the distance and near VA testing, the accuracy of WHOeyes was equivalent to ETDRS. The mean difference between the WHOeyes and ETDRS ranged from -0.084 to 0.012 log^MAR, and the quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) values were greater than 0.75 across all groups. The test-retest reliability of WHOeyes was high for both near and distance VA, with a mean difference ranging from -0.040 to 0.004 log^MAR and QWK all greater than 0.85. The questionnaire revealed an excellent user experience and acceptance of WHOeyes. Conclusion: WHOeyes could provide accurate measurement of the testing distance as well as the distance and near VA when compared to the gold standard ETDRS chart.

马方综合征 (Marfan syndrome, MFS) 是一种由原纤维蛋白-1(fibrillin-1,FBN-1)突变引起的全身性遗传性疾病，FBN-1基因突变与MFS相关表型的联系相关，目前已报道的MFS常见的眼部表现包括角膜扁平、长眼轴、晶状体异位以及视网膜病变等异常，这些眼部异常将对MFS患者的视力产生影响，如角膜异常可影响角膜高阶像差的异常，可能导致近视或散光等屈光状态异常，从而影响视觉质量，损害视力清晰度。此外，MFS的眼底血管病变，也可能导致MFS患者的视力丧失，研究发现，MFS视网膜血管及脉络膜血管的密度较正常人减少，并与最佳矫正视力相关，由于光感受器的代谢与营养供应与视网膜及脉络膜血管息息相关，血管异常可能与视力损失相关。由于MFS患者存在视力损害的风险，其早期诊断和治疗尤为重要，因此，了解MFS眼部病变的特点及其对视力的影响，对制定针对MFS眼病的治疗方案具有重要的意义。另外，由于MFS眼部异常与FBN1基因突变相关，其基因突变类型多样，致病机制复杂，总结MFS眼部特点对其发病机制的继续探索有一定的指导作用，因此，文章拟就MFS患者眼部生物学参数特点及其对视力的影响这一领域国内外的相关研究进展进行综述。

Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a systemic hereditary disease caused by fibrillin-1 (FBN-1) mutations. FBN-1 gene mutations are associated with MFS-related phenotypes. Common ocular manifestations of MFS reported so far include corneal flattening, long axial length, ectopia lentis, and retinal abnormalities. These ocular abnormalities will affect the vision of MFS patients. For example, corneal abnormalities can affect abnormalities in corneal higher-order aberrations, which may lead to abnormal refractive states such as myopia or astigmatism, thereby affecting visual quality and compromising visual acuity. In addition, retinal vascular abnormalities may also lead to vision loss in MFS patients. Studies have found that the density of retinal and choroidal blood vessels in MFS patients is lower than that in normal individuals and is associated with best corrected visual acuity. Given the close relationship between the metabolism and nutrient supply of photoreceptors and retinal and choroidal vasculature, vascular abnormalities may be linked to visual impairment. Since MFS patients are at risk of visual impairment, early diagnosis and treatment are particularly important. Therefore, understanding the characteristics of ocular manifestations in MFS and their impact on vision is crucial for devising effective treatment strategies for MFS-related ocular conditions. Additionally, as ocular abnormalities in MFS are linked to mutations in the FBN1 gene, which exhibit diverse mutation types and complex pathogenic mechanisms, summarizing the ocular features of MFS can provide valuable insights for further exploration into its pathogenesis. Therefore, this article aims to review the progress of domestic and international research on the ocular biological parameters of MFS patients and their impact on vision.

Background: Different visual acuity chart can be targeted to evaluate the visual function of patients with different eye diseases. We conducted a comparative analysis of the digital logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) vision chart and the standard logarithmic vision chart for the measurement of visual acuity after retinal detachment surgery.

Methods: We used the digital LogMAR vision chart and the standard logarithmic vision chart to measure the visual acuity of 100 patients (100 eyes) who underwent retinal detachment surgery at our hospital using the LogMAR recording method and compared the differences between the mean measurements obtained by both methods for all patients and for different age groups.

Results: When all of the patients were analyzed, the mean visual acuity differed between the digital LogMAR vision chart and the standard logarithmic vision chart by –0.07 LogMAR units. No significant difference was observed in the mean visual acuity between the two vision charts in the 10-20 year and 21-40 year age groups (P>0.05), while a significant difference was observed in post-operative mean visual acuity between the two vision charts for patients aged 41-65 years (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Both the digital LogMAR vision chart and the standard vision chart were effective and reliable for the measurement of visual acuity. The visual acuity measured by the standard vision chart was higher than that measured by the digital LogMAR vision chart. We recommend using the digital LogMAR vision chart as the preferred chart for measuring visual acuity after retinal detachment surgery.

Background: Different visual acuity chart can be targeted to evaluate the visual function of patients with different eye diseases. We conducted a comparative analysis of the digital logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) vision chart and the standard logarithmic vision chart for the measurement of visual acuity after retinal detachment surgery.

Methods: We used the digital LogMAR vision chart and the standard logarithmic vision chart to measure the visual acuity of 100 patients (100 eyes) who underwent retinal detachment surgery at our hospital using the LogMAR recording method and compared the differences between the mean measurements obtained by both methods for all patients and for different age groups.

Results: When all of the patients were analyzed, the mean visual acuity differed between the digital LogMAR vision chart and the standard logarithmic vision chart by –0.07 LogMAR units. No significant difference was observed in the mean visual acuity between the two vision charts in the 10-20 year and 21-40 year age groups (P>0.05), while a significant difference was observed in post-operative mean visual acuity between the two vision charts for patients aged 41-65 years (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Both the digital LogMAR vision chart and the standard vision chart were effective and reliable for the measurement of visual acuity. The visual acuity measured by the standard vision chart was higher than that measured by the digital LogMAR vision chart. We recommend using the digital LogMAR vision chart as the preferred chart for measuring visual acuity after retinal detachment surgery.

目的: 探讨 ETDRS 对数视力表对儿童视力检查的可重复性及其影响的相关因素。

方法: 在流行病学调查的过程中, 随机使用 ETDRS 对数视力表, 为 250 位裸眼视力低于 0.5 和 98 位视力正常儿童进行裸眼视力重复检查。
结果: 两次视力测量之间差异的均数为0.004log^±0.07; Kappa 分析结果具有很好的一致性(k = 0.71) ; 性别与视力检查一致性无明显相关(P = 0.845) ; 年龄与视力检查一致性有显著相关性(P = 0.019) , 年龄越小视力检查一致性越差; 屈光不正与视力检查一致性也有显著相关性(P = 0.000) , 近视度数在- 1.00D～- 5.00D 之间的儿童视力检查一致性相对差, 而正视眼的视力检查一致性较好。

结论: 结果提示 ETDRS 对数视力表适合儿童视力检查, 建议推广使用。

Purpose: To evaluate repeatability of the ETDRS log MAR visual acuity measurementin children and the relative influence factors.

Methods: The children (n = 348) with visual acuity less than 0.5 ( equal to 0.3 logunit) in either eye,or one tenth in children with normal visual acuity were chosen todo repeatable uncorrected VA measurement with Bland-Altman analysis and Kappa analysis using ETDRS acuity chart.

Results: The mean difference of visual acuity was 0.004log^±0.07. There was a significant repeatability (k = 0.71) between two visual acuity examination. There were significant consistent results both on male and female patients (P = 0.845) . A significant relationship was found between age and VA repeatability(P = 0.019) . The VA repeatability could also be influenced by refractive error (P = 0.000) . The acuity measurement in children with emmetropia (k = 0.82) had a higher repeatability than in the children with myopia (k = 0.66) .

Conclusions: The ETDRS visual acuity chart can provide a repeatable measure of visual acuity in children. It is recommended for clinic examination of children. 

目的：比较不同受检者在相同近视屈光欠矫下使用C字视力表和E字视力表所测得的视力差别及探讨导致这种差别的原因。方法：选取不同年龄段250名受检者，在完全矫正屈光度[最正之最佳视力(maximum plus to maximum visual acuity，MPMVA)]情况下附加相应的球镜造成相应的近视度数后比较使用2种不同的视力表测出的视力值变化情况。同时根据2种视力表的设计原理及视力表的不同记录法探讨造成数值不同的可能原因。结果：同一附加度情况下分别用C字视力表组和E字视力表组行方差分析，不同年龄组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。相同附加度情况下同一受检者使用C字视力表组和E字视力表组行t检验，两者差异具有统计学意义(t=?15.798，P<0.05)，C字视力表测得视力平均值小于E字视力表测得视力平均值。结论：受检者使用C字视力表比E字视力表检测视力结果更加优异；C字视力表和E字视力表的视标形状及开口方向不同是2种视力表检测结果差异的主要原因。

Objective: To compare the difference of visual acuity measured by C-chart and E-chart in the same myopic refractive undercorrection and to explore the causes of the difference. Methods: Two hundred and fifty subjects of different ages were selected to compare the changes of visual acuity measured by two different visual meters after adding corresponding spherical lenses to the maximum plus to maximum visual acuity (MPMVA) corrected diopter. At the same time, according to the design principle of the two kinds of visual acuity meters and the different recording methods of visual acuity tables, the possible reasons for the different values were discussed.Results: There was no significant difference between different age groups (P>0.05). Under the same degree of additionality, the visual acuity of the same subjects was tested by t-test with C visual acuity chart and E visual acuity chart. The difference was statistically significant (t=?15.798, P<0.05). The average visual acuity of C visual acuity table was smaller than that of E visual acuity table. Conclusion: The visual acuity of myopic patients tested by C visual acuity chart is better than by E visual acuity chart. The main reason for the difference between C visual chart and E visual chart was the different shape and opening direction of visual icons.

目的：探究特发性黄斑前膜(idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane，IMEM)患者在光学相干断层扫描(optical coherence tomography，OCT)的形态学改变与视力的相关性。方法：回顾性研究。基于OCT图像4级分级方案，纳入3级及以下的特发性黄斑前膜患者35例共37只眼进行OCT扫描，并借助第三方软件分析并获取每只眼在黄斑中心凹直径分别为1、3、6 mm共3个同心圆区域内视网膜各层的平均厚度值，并按照是否存在内核层(inner nuclear layer，INL)囊样改变分为两组。通过建立最小分辨角对数(minimum resolution angle in logarithmic，logMAR)最佳矫正视力(best corrected vision acuity，BCVA)与视网膜各层厚度值的多元线性回归方程，以及比较有INL囊样改变及无INL囊样改变两组的视力，分析视力与视网膜各层厚度值及INL囊样改变的关系。结果：多元线性回归分析显示，在直径1 mm的区域内，logMAR BCVA与神经纤维层(retina nerve fiber layer，RNFL)、INL的厚度值均呈正相关(均P<0.05)，而在直径3 mm和6 mm的区域内，logMAR BCVA仅与INL的厚度值呈正相关(均P<0.05)。与无INL囊样改变组相比，有INL囊样改变组视力及INL厚度差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论：特发性黄斑前膜患者当前的视力主要与RNFL和INL厚度值相关。发生在INL层的囊样改变可能很好的提示INL增厚，其与视力具有相关性，具有这种囊样改变的患者往往视力也较差。

Objective: To investigate the morphological changes detected by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and their relevance to vision in patients with idiopathic macular epiretinal membranes (IMEM). Methods: This is a retrospective study. OCT recorded 37 eyes with stage 3 and below IMEM according to the 4-level grading system based on OCT images among 35 patients. We managed to obtain thickness of all retina layers in three concentric circular regions with a diameter of 1 mm, 3 mm and 6 mm across macular fovea with the help of a third-party software. Plus we divided all 37 eyes into two groups according to whether there were cystic changes in the inner nuclear layer (INL). Multiple linear regression analyses were performed between thickness of all retina layers and current minimum resolution angle in logarithmic (logMAR) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The difference of BCVA between groups with cystic changes and without was also compared. Thus, the relationships between visual acuity and thickness of retina layers, cystic changes in INL were analyzed. Results: Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that thickness of both retina nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and inner nuclear layer have positive correlation with logMAR BCVA in the region with a diameter of 1 mm (P<0.05), while in regions of a diameter of 3 mm and 6 mm, only INL thickness remained positively relevant (all P<0.05). There were significant differences in BCVA and thickness of INL between groups with INL cystic changes and without (all P<0.05). Conclusion: Current visual acuity among preoperative IMEM patients was mostly associated with thickness of RNFL and INL. Cystic change in INL layer may be a good indicator of INL thickening and was visually correlated. Those with this change tend to have worse vision.