目的：在麻醉监测管理(monitored anesthesia care，MAC)中，通过与咪唑安定比较，观察右美托咪 定在玻璃体视网膜手术中应用的效果、安全性，探讨其应用可行性。方法：将择期玻璃体视网膜 手术患者40例随机双盲分入咪唑安定组(M组)和右美托咪定组(D组)。每组20例，两组患者均行球 后神经阻滞麻醉，连接脑电双频指数(bispectral index，BIS)监测仪监测并维持BIS值在70~90间， 观察和比较麻醉手术中及复苏期的平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure，MAP)、心率(heart rate， HR)、呼吸频率(respiratory rate，RR)、脉搏氧饱和度(oxygen saturation，SpO2)、Ramsay镇静评 分、疼痛数字评分法(Numerical Rating Scale，NRS疼痛评分)、手术医生和患者麻醉效果评分及不 良反应的差异。结果：与麻醉前比较，手术期D组用药后10 min内的心率、血压下降差异有统计学 意义(P<0.05)，且用药后10 min内D组心率下降幅度较M组更大(P<0.05)。在手术期和复苏期，D组 的NRS疼痛评分均显著低于M组且差异有统计学意义(均P<0.001)，而两组的Ramsay镇静评分差异 无统计学意义(P>0.05)。D组手术期患者的体动发生率和羟考酮使用率显著低于M组(均P<0.05)。 手术医生和患者的麻醉效果评分D组显著高于M组(均P<0.001)。结论：右美托咪定用于玻璃体视 网膜手术，较咪唑安定镇痛效果好且不良反应少，麻醉效果更好。
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for the monitored anesthesia care (MAC) management of patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery. Methods: Forty patients undergoing selective vitreoretinal surgery were double-blind and randomly dividedinto midazolam group (group M) and dexmedetomidine group (group D), each group had 20 patients. Patients in both groups were anesthetized with posterior bulbous nerve block. Bispectral index (BIS) monitor was connected and the BIS value was maintained between 70 and 90. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), Ramsay sedation score, numerical rating scale (NRS), surgeon’s and patient’s anesthesia effect score and adverse reactions were recorded during anesthesia and recovery period. Results: Compared with the data of pre-anesthesia, there were statistical differences of the decrease of HR and MAP in group D within the 10 minutes after medication (P<0.05), and the decrease of HR in group D was greater than that in group M (P<0.05). The NRS pain score in group D was significantly lower than that in group M with statistical significance (P<0.001) during the operation and resuscitation, while there was no significant difference in Ramsay sedation score between the two groups during the operation and resuscitation (P>0.05). In terms of adverse reactions to anesthesia, the incidence of spontaneous movement and oxycodone utilization in group D were significantly lower than those in group M (P<0.05). The anesthesia effect scores of surgeons and patients in group D were significantly higher than those in group M (all P<0.001). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine has better analgesic effect and less adverse reactions than midazolam in vitreoretinal surgery.
目的：观察玻璃体腔内注射不同剂量康柏西普治疗早产儿视网膜病变(retinopathy of prematurity，ROP)的疗效以及术后的眼压变化。方法：前瞻性随机对照研究。将2018年1月1日至2021年6月30日在厦门市妇幼保健院确诊为Ι型阈值前期ROP、阈值期ROP、急进性ROP(aggressive ROP，A-ROP)的患儿纳入研究。随机分为减量组和常量组，分别玻璃体腔注射10 mg/mL康柏西普注射液0.015 mL(含康柏西普0.15 mg)和0.025 mL(含康柏西普0.25 mg)。测量并记录注射前5min、注射后5min、30min、1h、12h及24 h的眼压情况。术后1周开始随访眼底情况。疗效评价分为一次治愈、复发和加重。结果：共49例98眼纳入研究，常量组27例54眼，一次治愈成功率79.6%(43/54)，复发率16.7%(9/54)，加重率3.7%(2/54)；减量组2 2例44眼，一次治愈成功率68.2%(30/44)，复发率27.3%(12/44)，加重率4.5%(2/44)；两组间差异无统计学意义(χ 2=1.672，P=0.196)。治疗前5min两组眼压差异无统计学意义(P=0.494)；注药后5 min、1 h、12h两组眼压差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)；注药后24 h两组间的眼压差异无统计学意义(P=0.101)。常量组注药前5 min和注药后24 h眼压差异有统计学意义(P=0.03)，减量组注药前5 min和注药后24h眼压差异无统计学意义(P=0.84)。结论：减量剂量康柏西普(0.15mg)治疗ROP有效，疗效与常规剂量(0.25 mg)相近，且术后眼压升高幅度较低，更快恢复至术前水平，更安全。
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of intravitreal injection of various doses of conbercept in the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and change of intraocular pressure (IOP) after operation. Methods: It was a prospective randomized controlled study. Children who were diagnosed with pre-threshold ROP, threshold phrase ROP, and aggressive ROP (A-ROP) in Xiamen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2021 were included in the study. The children were randomly divided into a reduction group and a constant group, and received intravitreal injection of10 mg/mL conbercept at 0.015 mL (containing 0.15 mg of conbercept) and 0.025 mL (containing 0.25 mg of conbercept) respectively. IOP was measured and recorded 5 min before injection, 5 min, 30 min, 1 h, 12 h and 24 h after injection. The fundus condition was followed up 1 week after the operation. The efficacy evaluation is divided into one cure, recurrence and exacerbation. Results: A total of 98 eyes of 49 cases were included in thestudy. For 27 cases of 54 eyes in the constant group, the one-time cure success rate was 79.6% (43/54), the recurrence rate was 16.7% (9/54), and the exacerbation rate was 3.7% (2/54). In the reduction group, there were 22 cases (44 eyes). The one-time cure success rate was 68.2% (30/44), the recurrence rate was 27.3% (12/44), and the exacerbation rate was 4.5% (2/44). There was no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=1.672,P=0.196). There was no significant difference in IOP between the 2 groups 5 min before treatment (P=0.494). There were statistically significantdifferences in IOP between the 2 groups at 5 min after injection, 1 h after injection, and 12 h after injection (all P<0.05). There was no difference in IOP between the two groups 24 h after injection (P=0.101). There was a statistically significant difference in IOP between 5 min before and 24 h after injection in the constant group (P=0.03), and there was no significant difference in IOP between 5 min before and 24 h after injection in the reduction group (P=0.84). Conclusion: Reduced dose of conbercept (0.15 mg) is effective in the treatment of ROP, and the efficacy is similar to that of conventional dose (0.25 mg). The reduction can help lower the increase of postoperative IOP, returning to the preoperative level more rapidly and safely.
目的：研究早产儿视网膜病变患儿经不同治疗措施后屈光状态的改变。方法：将72例(127眼)早产儿视网膜病变患儿按治疗方式分为3组：激光光凝组、注药(抗血管内皮生长因子药物)组和自然消退组。并于治疗前，治疗后1、4、7、12个月对其进行睫状肌麻痹检影验光，对比分析3组的球镜和等效球镜的差异。结果：在治疗后1、4、7及12个月，三组患儿的球镜度和等效球镜度的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)：注药组的球镜和等效球镜小于自然退化组及激光组(均P0.05)。治疗后12个月时激光光凝组、注药组和自然消退组近视发生率分别是2.4%、7.8%和2.0%，差异无统计学意义(P=0.356)。结论：经不同治疗措施的ROP患儿近视发生率无明显差异，但经玻璃体腔注射抗VEGF药物的ROP患儿正视化进程更快。
Objective: To observe the changes of refractive statues in infants with retinopathy of prematurity retinopathyof prematurity (ROP) after different treatments. Methods: According to different treatment methods, 72 cases(127 eyes) of infants with ROP were divided into 3 groups: laser photocoagulation group, intravitreal injectionof anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs group and natural regression group. Their sphere andspherical equivalent were measured by retinoscopy optometrist after the ciliary muscles paralyzed. The data beforetreatments and 1, 4, 7 and 12 months after treatments were recorded and analyzed. Results: The differences ofsphere and spherical equivalent among three groups were statistically significant: intravitreal injection of VEGFdrugs group was lower than natural regression group and the laser photocoagulation group, but there was no significant difference between natural regression group and laser photocoagulation group. Incidence of myopiaof laser photocoagulation, intravitreal injection of VEGF drugs, natural regression group were 2.4%, 7.8%, 2.0%,which was not statistically significant. Conclusion: There was no significant difference about the incidence rate ofmyopia among the three groups, but the emmetropization in infants with ROP after intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs might be faster in the future.
幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori，H P)感染是中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(central serous chorioretinopathy，CSC)的一个危险因素，但是在HP感染和CSC相关性的研究仍存在争议，目前有两种观点：一是认为HP感染可能是CSC的一个危险因素，二是认为两者之间并没有相关性。本文将就对HP感染是否为CSC危险因素文献进行综述，同时探讨其发病机制。
Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection is a risk factor for central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). But the existing studies tend to support two distinctively different trends regarding the link between HP infection and CSC. The first group tend to support that: HP infection may be a risk of CSC, and the second tend to claim to no correlation between the two. This paper will review the literature on whether HP infection is a risk factor for CSC and discuss its pathogenesis.
糖尿病视网膜病变(diabetic retinopathy，DR)在糖尿病肾病(diabetic nephropathy，DN)人群，特别是终末期糖尿病肾病(end stage diabetic nephropathy，ESRD)患者中的发病率和严重程度明显高于糖尿病人群。其中ESRD的一项重要治疗手段——血液透析(Hemodialysis，HD)可能会增加机体氧化应激反应、出血风险以及视神经的缺血缺氧，加重DR的发生发展；但另一方面也可通过清除尿毒症毒素、控制血压以及清除多余体液等途径改善糖尿病和DN对眼部的损伤。
The incidence and severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN), especially those with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), were higher than those with diabetes. Hemodialysis (HD), an important treatment of ESRD, may aggravate DR by increasing the oxidative stress, fundus hemorrhage and hypoxia of the optic nerve. On the other hand, HD can improve the ocular damage caused by diabetes mellitus and DN by removing uremia toxin, controlling blood pressure and removing excess body fluid.
目的：以光学相干断层扫描血管成像(optical coherence tomography angiography，OCTA)观察视网膜分支静脉阻塞(branch retinal vein occlusion，BRVO)抗血管内皮生长因子(vascular endothelial growth factor，VEGF)治疗前后的变化。方法：回顾性收集从2017年1月至2018年1 2月在汕头国际眼科中心的确诊为BRVO合并黄斑水肿的患者共3 1例3 2眼。患眼行玻璃体腔注射抗VEGF药物治疗，记录治疗前和治疗后1个月的最佳矫正视力(best corrected visual acuity，BCVA)，OCTA检查视网膜黄斑中心凹厚度(foveal macular thickness，FMT)、黄斑区血流密度。比较治疗前后各指标的变化。结果：治疗后BCVA较治疗前显著提高，差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)；FMT[(242.13±86.02) μm]较治疗前[(521.44±190.27) μm]明显下降，差异有统计学 意义(P<0.001)；中心凹浅层血流密度[(18.44±4.98)%]及中心凹旁浅层血流密度[(44.83±3.19)%]均较治疗前[(25.46±9.21)%，(46.06±5.25)%]相比明显下降，差异有统计学意义(P <0.001)。结论：玻璃体腔注射抗VEGF治疗BRVO合并黄斑水肿效果显著；OCTA能有效评价抗VEGF治疗BRVO合并黄斑水肿的临床疗效。
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy in patients with macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF drug. Methods: In this retrospective study, 32 eyes of 31 patients with BRVO combined with macular edema at Joint Shantou international eye center of Shantou University and TheChinese University of Hong Kong during January 2017 to December 2018 were enrolled in this study. All the affected eyes received intravitreal anti-VEGF drug injections. BCVA (best corrective visual acuity) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) were performed before and one month after intravitreal anti-VEGF drug injections. Foveal macular thickness (FMT), macular blood flow density was measured in all eyes and compared. Results: The BCVA before therapy was (0.77±0.46) LogMAR and increased to (0.46±0.30) LogMAR in one month after therapy, which showed a statistical difference (P<0.001). The FMT, foveal superficial vascular plexus flow density and para foveal superficial vascular plexus flow density before therapy were (521.44±190.27) μm, (21.85±6.17)% and (46.29±2.70)%, respectively. The FMT, foveal superficial vascular plexus flow density and para foveal superficial vascular plexus flow density decreased to (242.13±86.02) μm, (18.40±5.18)% and (44.75±3.40)%, respectively. There was significant statistical difference for them (P<0.001). Conclusion: Intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF is effective in the treatment of BRVO combined with macular edema. OCTA can effectively evaluate the clinical efficacy of anti-VEGF in the treatment of BRVO combined with macular edema.
